County road commissioner: Counties of Madera and Tehama.

The legislative findings in Section 3 were changed from citing 'the particular needs of the County of Madera' to 'the particular needs of the Counties of Madera and Tehama,' broadening the stated justification for the special statute to cover both affected counties.

The legislative counsel's digest was updated to reflect that findings apply to both counties rather than just Madera, and formatting was cleaned up (line numbers removed, enrollment page elements added).

The bill was assigned Chapter 399 and received the standard 'State of California Authenticated Electronic Legal Material' header replacing the enrolled bill tracking information (clerk signatures, blank governor receipt date).

Line wrapping, indentation, and page numbering were adjusted to conform to the chaptered law format. The statutory text of Sections 2006.7, 2006.8, and Section 3 is substantively identical.

The County of Tehama is now included alongside Madera. A new Section 2006.7 was added to the Streets and Highways Code allowing Tehama's Board of Supervisors to abolish the road commissioner office by transferring all duties to the county director of public works, mirroring the existing provision for Madera in Section 2006.8.

The legislative findings and declarations section was updated to reference both Counties of Madera and Tehama rather than Madera alone.

Senator Dahle was added as a co-author of the bill, likely reflecting Tehama's sponsorship interest.

Section 2 (legislative findings) was expanded to specify that the particular need justifying a special statute is 'difficulty in finding properly qualified candidates for the position of county road commissioner.' This makes the constitutional justification for the local law more concrete.