Law enforcement: settlement agreements.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, and requires the commission to, among other things, establish a certification program for peace officers, as defined. Existing law requires the commission to establish procedures for accepting complaints from members of the public regarding peace officers or law enforcement agencies that may be investigated. Existing law establishes, within the commission, the Peace Officer Standards Accountability Division and requires the division, among other things, to bring proceedings seeking the suspension or revocation of certification of a peace officer. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, generally requires public records to be open for inspection by the public. Existing law provides numerous exceptions to this requirement. Under existing law, the personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers are confidential and not subject to public inspection. Existing law provides certain exemptions to this confidentiality, including the reports, investigations, and findings of certain incidents involving the use of force by a peace officer. This bill would additionally exempt agreements between an employing agency and a peace officer that, among other things, require the agency to destroy, remove, or conceal a record of a misconduct investigation. The bill would declare that its provisions are severable. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 832.7 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 847 and AB 1178, to be operative only if this bill and AB 847 or AB 1178 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Signed Oct 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
09/09/25 - Amended Senate
→
09/16/25 - Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Sep 16, 2025
MINOR
The changes from the Amended Senate version to the Enrolled version of AB 1388 are primarily formatting and structural: all line numbers were removed, the document was reformatted into standard enrolled bill layout, and page numbering changed from 95 to 94. The substantive policy content of the bill - which declares settlement agreements that obscure officer misconduct records against public policy and adds such agreements to the list of disclosable records under Penal Code Section 832.7 - appears unchanged.
TECHNICAL
All line-by-line numbering (line 1, line 2, etc.) was removed from the bill text as part of converting from the Senate amended format to the enrolled bill format.
Page numbers changed from 95 to 94 throughout the document, reflecting re-pagination in the enrolled version.
SCOPE
The conditional Section 2.1 amendment, which would have added civilian oversight boards and commissions (established under Government Code Section 25303.7 or local ordinance) to the list of entities whose investigations are exempt from personnel record confidentiality, appears to have been removed from the enrolled version. This provision was only operative if AB 847 or AB 1178 were also enacted and this bill was enacted last.
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2025 · Assembly Jun 4, 2025
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 12, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
13
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Oct 13, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3476.).
lower
Sep 12, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2989.).
upper
Sep 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-10)
assembly
Jun 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 2018.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1388
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1388. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline