AB 1366 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Reimbursement for pharmacist services.

Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which health care services are provided to low-income individuals pursuant to a schedule of benefits. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Under existing law, pharmacist services are a benefit under the Medi-Cal program, subject to federal approval, and the rate of reimbursement for pharmacist services is 85% of the fee schedule for physician services, except for medication therapy management (MTM) pharmacist services. Existing law requires the department to implement an MTM reimbursement methodology relating to the dispensing of qualified specialty drugs by an eligible contracting pharmacy, which would be intended to supplement Medi-Cal payments to eligible pharmacies for MTM pharmacist services provided in conjunction with certain specialty drug therapy categories. This bill would additionally require the rate of reimbursement for advanced practice pharmacist services to be the same as the fee schedule for physician services, including MTM pharmacist services. The bill would require the department to implement an MTM reimbursement methodology relating to the use of drugs to ensure that Medi-Cal payments are only made to eligible advanced practice pharmacists or pharmacies for MTM pharmacist services provided in conjunction with certain specialty drug therapy categories. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer that offers coverage for pharmacist services to pay or reimburse the cost of the service performed by a pharmacist at an in-network pharmacy or a pharmacist at an out-of-network pharmacy if the insurer has an out-of-network pharmacy benefit. Existing law authorizes this payment or reimbursement when specified conditions are met, including that the coverage otherwise provides reimbursement for identical services performed by other licensed health care providers. This bill would additionally require those health care service plans and disability insurers to pay or reimburse the cost of the service performed by an advanced practice pharmacist enrolled as a provider with the plan or insurer. The bill would authorize payment or reimbursement if the coverage otherwise provides reimbursement for similar services performed by other licensed health care providers, among other requirements. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/28/25 - Amended Assembly 01/05/26 - Amended Assembly · 6 edits · Jan 5, 2026
MODERATE
The January 2026 amendment introduces a two-tier reimbursement system for pharmacist services under Medi-Cal: general pharmacist services remain at 85 percent of physician rates, while a new category of 'advanced practice pharmacist' services is reimbursed at the full physician fee schedule including MTM services. The bill also narrows MTM eligibility to advanced practice pharmacists specifically, adds a requirement for the department to seek federal approval to recognize pharmacists at federally qualified health centers, and removes a prior legislative intent statement about future standard-of-care legislation.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to create a distinct 'advanced practice pharmacist' category with higher reimbursement parity to physicians, while simultaneously narrowing MTM service eligibility to that advanced category. The addition of FQHC recognition broadens where pharmacists can be reimbursed under Medi-Cal.
FISCAL

A new reimbursement tier is created: advanced practice pharmacist services are paid at the same rate as physician services under Medi-Cal (including MTM), while general pharmacist services remain at 85 percent of physician rates.

Fiscal committee vote changed from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now carries fiscal implications requiring committee review.

ELIGIBILITY

MTM pharmacist services reimbursement under Section 14132.969 is now limited to 'eligible advanced practice pharmacists or pharmacies' rather than any eligible pharmacy, narrowing who can receive MTM payments.

The standard for when plans must reimburse pharmacist services was broadened from requiring coverage of 'identical services' performed by other providers to 'similar services,' making it easier for pharmacist claims to qualify.

REQUIREMENT

A new provision requires the department to seek federal approval of a state plan amendment to recognize pharmacists as health care providers at federally qualified health centers for Medi-Cal reimbursement purposes.

SCOPE

The legislative intent statement directing future legislation to establish or clarify the standard of care applicable to pharmacists in California was removed entirely.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 5, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Heath Flora
Heath Flora
RRepublican
CA
9