Hospital pricing.
What changed between versions
Verification timing changed from 'prior to discharge' to 'before billing the patient' in multiple provisions (subdivision c(5)(A), (B), and (C)), giving hospitals more time between discharge and billing to complete verification.
Independent verification by the hospital was changed from mandatory ('shall first attempt') to optional ('may attempt'), reducing the obligation on hospitals to verify through their own records before requesting documentation from patients.
Removed paragraph (c)(6) which had allowed hospitals to make eligibility determinations after patient discharge, subject to compliance with notice and billing requirements.
Added 'or voluntarily provided by the patient' as an acceptable information source when a third-party tool fails to return data, expanding what hospitals can rely on for good faith eligibility evaluation.
Removed the requirement (former subdivision l(3)) that written notices sent to patients presumptively determined eligible for discounted payment must include a statement that additional assistance may be available under the hospital's charity care and discount payment policies.
The prohibition on requiring patients to apply for Medicare, Medi-Cal, or other coverage before receiving discounted payment was narrowed by removing 'charity care' from the scope in both subdivisions (b)(3) and (c)(3), so it now only protects the screening and provision of discounted payment.
The prohibition on third-party scoring tools was narrowed from banning scores that predict 'propensity or ability to pay' to only banning scores that predict 'propensity to pay,' potentially allowing tools that assess a patient's ability to pay.
The definition of 'screen' or 'screening' was narrowed by removing 'and presumptively determine,' so screening is now defined solely as the process to identify if a patient may be eligible, separate from the presumptive determination step.