AB 1271 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Communications: broadband internet service providers.

Summary
Existing law, the Digital Equity Bill of Rights, provides that it is the principle of the state to ensure digital equity for all residents of the state, that, among other things, residents have access to broadband that meets specific requirements, and provides that it is the policy of the state that, to the extent technically feasible, broadband internet subscribers benefit from equal access to broadband internet service within the service area of a broadband provider. This bill, contingent upon funding for this purpose, would require a broadband internet service provider, on or before January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, to submit to the Department of Consumer Affairs, or the Department of Broadband and Digital Equity if Assembly Bill 693 of the 2025–26 Regular Session is enacted, a report containing broadband internet access service pricing and speed data that includes, among other information, the advertised speeds offered to consumers and the advertised and total prices paid by consumers. The bill would require the department to publish an annual broadband internet access service affordability and speed report aggregating and analyzing the data submitted by the broadband internet service providers and would require the department to make the data submitted by broadband internet service providers available to the public, as specified. The bill would make a broadband internet service provider that fails to comply with these provisions subject to an administrative penalty not to exceed $1,000 per violation per day until compliance is achieved. This bill would require a broadband internet service provider to establish and maintain a dedicated consumer complaint resolution process that allows consumers to submit complaints via telephone, email, and an online portal, and would require a broadband internet service provider to respond to a complaint within 7 business days and provide a resolution, explanation, or corrective action within a specified timeframe. The bill would prescribe remedies for a consumer if a broadband internet service provider fails to resolve a complaint within the specified timeframe or refuses to act in good faith, including the issuance of a minimum credit of $50 for a complaint that remains unresolved beyond 60 days without valid justification. The bill would require a broadband internet service provider to disclose the complaint resolution process and remedies clearly and conspicuously in its terms of service, in its billing statements, and on its internet website. The bill would require a broadband internet service provider to report complaint statistics to the department, as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/28/25 - Amended Assembly 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly · 8 edits · Apr 10, 2025
MODERATE
AB 1271 was substantially restructured in this amendment. A new Section 1 with legislative findings was added, replacing a simple statement of legislative intent. The bill now explicitly ties public data access to the California Public Records Act, adds a requirement for the department to adopt a publicly accessible data reporting template, and makes rulemaking discretionary rather than mandatory. Several definitions were refined, including a new 'speed performance' term and a new cross-reference to Civil Code Section 3100 for 'broadband internet access service.'
SCOPE

A new Section 1 was added containing legislative findings and declarations about broadband internet access service, factors affecting speed performance, and the public interest in ensuring subscribers receive advertised speeds. This replaced a simple statement of legislative intent to bring transparency to internet speeds.

DEFINITION

New definition of 'broadband internet access service' was added, cross-referencing Section 3100 of the Civil Code. A new definition of 'speed performance' was also added, defined as 'the speed delivered to the customer.'

The definition of 'broadband internet service provider' was changed from 'any business that provides' to 'any business entity that provides,' potentially narrowing or clarifying who is covered.

REQUIREMENT

The reporting requirements in Section 21221 were expanded to include 'speed performance' as a separate required data element, and the term 'broadband pricing and speed data' was changed to 'broadband internet access service pricing and speed data' throughout.

A new requirement was added in Section 21223(b) that the department shall adopt a data reporting template for entities to report broadband pricing and speed data, and that this template must be in an open data format readily accessible to the public.

ENFORCEMENT

Public data availability in Section 21222(b) was rewritten to explicitly require compliance with the California Public Records Act (Government Code Division 10), rather than leaving the standard solely to departmental discretion. This gives the public a stronger legal basis for accessing the data.

The rulemaking authority in Section 21223 was changed from 'shall adopt rules and regulations' to 'may adopt rules and regulations,' making it discretionary rather than mandatory. This gives the department flexibility but removes the obligation to issue implementing regulations.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee determination changed from 'no' to 'yes' and the state-mandated local program determination changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the amendment triggered new fiscal analysis requirements.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on C. & C. and B. & P.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mia Bonta
Mia Bonta
DDemocratic
CA
18