AB 1230 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pupil discipline: expulsions: procedures.

Summary
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to order a pupil expelled upon finding that the pupil committed one or more of a specified act, as provided. Existing law requires an expulsion order to remain in effect until the governing board orders the readmission of a pupil and requires the governing board to recommend a plan of rehabilitation for the pupil at the time of the expulsion order that may include recommendations for, among other things, improved academic performance, tutoring, or counseling. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to adopt rules and regulations establishing a procedure for the filing and processing of requests for readmission and the process for the required review of all expelled pupils for readmission. Existing law requires the governing board, upon completion of the readmission process, to readmit the pupil unless the governing board makes a finding that the pupil has not met the conditions of the rehabilitation plan or continues to pose a danger to campus safety or to other pupils or employees of the school district. Existing law requires each county superintendent of schools in counties that operate community schools, in conjunction with superintendents of school districts within the county, to develop a plan for providing education services to all expelled pupils in that county, as provided. Existing law requires the plan to enumerate existing educational alternatives for expelled pupils, identify gaps in educational services to expelled pupils, and strategies for filling those service gaps. Existing law requires each school district to maintain specified data related to pupil expulsions, including, among other things, the number of pupils recommended for expulsion. This bill would require a plan of rehabilitation to include periodic review and a preliminary assessment for readmission at least 45 days before the end of the expulsion term, be tailored to the individual pupil's needs, and address the pupil's behavior that led to the expulsion and would authorize the plan of rehabilitation to be developed in consultation with specified school personnel, as provided. The bill would require the governing board of a school district to (1) assist the pupil in locating opportunities accessible to the pupil that are necessary to complete the requirements of a plan for rehabilitation, as provided, and (2) as part of the process for a required review, indicate whether or not the pupil had access to the necessary resources to complete their rehabilitation plan. The bill would prohibit the governing board from requiring the pupil or the pupil's parent or guardian to pay for any costs or services that the governing board determines to be necessary for the pupil to complete a plan of rehabilitation and would prohibit an expelled pupil from being denied readmission due to financial or transportation barriers or a lack of viable opportunities to complete a term of the rehabilitation plan. The bill would require the governing board to instead readmit the pupil, unless the governing board makes a finding that the pupil (1) has not substantially met the conditions of the rehabilitation plan despite having access to the necessary resources and viable opportunities to complete their plan or (2) continues to exhibit documented behaviors that the pupil was expelled for or is documented to have committed one or more new acts during the expulsion term that would make the pupil eligible for another expulsion. The bill would authorize the governing board to extend the expulsion term, as specified, if the governing board makes one of those specified findings, as provided. This bill would require the above-described plan for providing education services to all expelled pupils in the county to (1) include any services that may be required pursuant to an expelled pupil's individualized education program or plan pursuant to Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (2) identify multiple educational programs and services for expelled pupils, (3) outline a timely readmission process after the expulsion term is complete, and (4) describe the steps to be taken by the school district to support the successful transition of a pupil upon readmission, as provided. The bill would require each school district to maintain additional data related to pupil expulsions, including, among other things, the average length of expulsion terms, including any extensions, and would delete obsolete provisions related to that data. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies or local officials, the bill would constitute a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Signed Oct 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/21/25 - Amended Assembly 07/03/25 - Amended Senate · 9 edits · Jul 3, 2025
MAJOR
The Senate amendment to AB 1230 makes several substantive changes to pupil expulsion and readmission procedures. It relaxes the standard for denying readmission by requiring that pupils had access to both necessary resources AND viable opportunities, removes a cap on how long expulsion terms can be extended, eliminates the funding-withholding penalty for non-compliance with data reporting, and gives districts more flexibility in developing rehabilitation plans. These changes shift the balance somewhat toward school district discretion while maintaining the core framework of mandatory readmission unless specific findings are made.
ELIGIBILITY

The standard for denying readmission now requires that the pupil had access to both 'necessary resources and viable opportunities' to complete their rehabilitation plan, rather than just 'necessary resources.' This makes it harder for a school board to deny readmission because it must show the pupil also had viable opportunities.

REQUIREMENT

The requirement that the rehabilitation plan be developed 'by a team of educators' was removed. The plan now only needs to be developed 'in consultation with school personnel who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the pupil,' giving districts more flexibility in who develops the plan.

The requirement that the governing board 'review' educational options with the pupil and family was changed to simply 'notify' them of available options, reducing the interactive obligation on the district.

TIMELINE

The maximum duration for extending an expulsion term was removed. Previously, extensions could not exceed the end of the semester following the original term's end. Now the term can be extended 'one semester at a time' with no stated cap on total extension length.

The deadline for completing the initial referral of an expelled pupil for enrollment in an educational program was extended from 2 days after the expulsion to 3 days after the expulsion.

ENFORCEMENT

The provision allowing the Superintendent to withhold state funding (apportionment under Section 48664) from school districts that fail to report required outcome data was deleted. The Superintendent can still require reporting as part of coordinated compliance review, but there is no longer a financial penalty for non-compliance.

FISCAL

The prohibition on requiring pupils or parents to pay was expanded from covering 'costs necessary to complete' the plan to 'costs or services the governing board determines to be necessary for the pupil to complete' the plan, broadening what is covered.

TECHNICAL

Data reporting requirements were restructured: the separate metric tracking 'percentage of expulsion terms that are extended each school year and the reasons for those extensions' was removed, and instead the average length of expulsions now includes any extensions. The county plan no longer needs to reflect an analysis of this data.

The readmission assessment was renamed from 'assessment for readmission' to 'preliminary assessment for readmission,' clarifying its nature as a preliminary step rather than a final determination.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2025 · Assembly Jun 3, 2025

How they voted

400
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 3, 2025
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
6
Oct 3, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2936.).
lower
Sep 4, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2465.).
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
Jun 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1884.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors