Public utilities: judicial review.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a decision or order of the Public Utilities Commission to file a petition for a writ of review in the court of appeal or the Supreme Court for purposes of reviewing the decision or order within 30 days after the commission issues its decision denying the application for a rehearing, or, if the application was granted, within 30 days after the commission issues its decision on the rehearing, or at least 120 days after the application is granted if no decision on rehearing has been issued. This bill would extend the 30-day time periods to 90 days. For a petition challenging a final decision of the commission on the grounds that the final decision substantially deviated from a proposed decision of a commission administrative law judge, the bill would require the court to presume the final decision to be arbitrary and unlawful unless the commission can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that the deviations were necessary to comply with state or federal law. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for public utilities, including electrical and gas corporations, and requires those rates to be just and reasonable. This bill would prohibit the commission from authorizing electrical or gas corporations to recover from their ratepayers the costs associated with seeking judicial review of a commission decision by a state or federal court or requesting relief from a commission decision at a federal agency. The bill would require the electrical and gas corporation to track those costs. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/21/25 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1222
·
2 edits
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in document presentation format rather than substantive policy content. The bill text moves from a clean legislative document layout to a web page rendering with navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, search, etc.). The underlying provisions of AB 1222 remain the same: extending judicial review filing deadlines from 30 to 90 days, prohibiting utility cost recovery for judicial review expenses, and creating a presumption against final decisions that deviate from administrative law judge proposed decisions.
TECHNICAL
Document format changed from a clean legislative text layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web page rendering with navigation menus, search tools, and bill tracking features. No substantive policy language was altered.
Section numbering shows both 748.4 and 748.8 in both versions, indicating an amendment markup artifact where the section number was changed from 748.4 to 748.8 during the legislative process. This appears identically in both versions of the diff.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1222
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1222. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline