AB 1166 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fair Debt Settlement Practices Act.

Summary
Existing law, the Fair Debt Settlement Practices Act, prohibits a debt settlement provider from engaging in false, deceptive, or misleading acts or practices, as specified, when providing debt settlement services. Existing law requires a debt settlement provider to provide a consumer with certain disclosures along with an unsigned copy of the proposed written contract between the debt settlement provider and the consumer and prohibits certain unfair, abusive, or deceptive practices in connection with payment processor activities. Existing law authorizes a consumer to terminate a contract for debt settlement services at any time without a fee or penalty of any sort by notifying the debt settlement provider, at which time the debt settlement provider is required to, among other things, provide, within 3 business days, a detailed accounting of any amounts received or expected to be received by the debt settlement provider from the consumer's settlement account after the debt settlement provider received effective notice of request for cancellation. Existing law authorizes a consumer to bring a civil action for violation of these provisions. This bill would expand the protections for consumers described above to include commercial debtors, as defined, and make other, nonsubstantive and related changes.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025 Last action Aug 29, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/21/25 - Introduced → 07/07/25 - Amended Senate · 7 edits · Jul 7, 2025
MODERATE
The Senate amendment to AB 1166 significantly expands and restructures the Fair Debt Settlement Practices Act to cover commercial debt alongside consumer debt. It replaces the term 'commercial financing recipient' with the broader term 'debtor,' adds a new definition of 'commercial financing' that includes loans of $5,000 or more (not just factoring and asset-based lending), creates separate fee rules for commercial versus consumer debt, and excludes for-profit businesses above the small business gross receipts threshold from protection.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'commercial financing' is expanded to include any loan with a principal amount of $5,000 or more, or any loan under an open-end credit program (secured or unsecured), intended primarily for non-personal use. Previously it only covered accounts receivable purchases, factoring, asset-based lending, commercial loans, commercial open-end credit plans, and lease financing. A new provision allows lenders to rely on a borrower's written statement of intended purposes without verifying actual use.

The term 'commercial financing recipient' is replaced throughout with 'debtor,' broadening the category of protected persons beyond just those receiving commercial financing.

A new defined term 'commercial debt' is added, meaning money (principal, interest, fees, or other charges) due or owing relating to one or more commercial loans. The old single 'debt' definition is split into separate 'commercial debt' and 'consumer debt' definitions.

ELIGIBILITY

A new two-part eligibility test is added for who qualifies as a 'debtor': (1) must owe commercial debt of $500,000 or less and be responsible for repaying it, AND (2) must NOT be a for-profit business entity with annual gross receipts exceeding the 'small business' threshold set by the Department of General Services under Government Code Section 14837. This excludes larger businesses from the bill's protections.

REQUIREMENT

Fee restrictions are now differentiated by debt type. For consumer debt, the existing rules apply (fees only after a settlement is achieved, with proportional or percentage-of-savings calculations). For commercial debt, a new simpler cap applies: providers may not collect or retain fees in excess of the difference between the amount owed at enrollment and the amount agreed in the settlement.

The three-calendar-day pre-contract disclosure requirement is now explicitly limited to consumers only. A new provision states that this paragraph does not apply to commercial debt, meaning commercial debtors do not get the same advance disclosure period before signing a contract.

SCOPE

The bill's stated purpose changes from 'relating to consumer debt' to 'relating to consumer commercial debt,' reflecting the expanded coverage of both consumer and commercial debt settlement services under a single framework.

Floor votes · Assembly May 15, 2025

How they voted

73–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 79
May 15, 2025
D Democratic60
57 Yea 3
95% Yea
R Republican19
16 Yea 3
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jul 3, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I., JUD. and APPR.
upper
May 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1560.)
lower
May 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on B.&F.
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Avelino Valencia
Avelino Valencia
DDemocratic
CA
68