Prisons: elderly employment.
Summary
The California Constitution prohibits involuntary servitude, but exempts from this provision any servitude that is a punishment for a crime. Existing law requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to require each able-bodied inmate, including a condemned inmate, to work as prescribed by CDCR regulations. Existing CDCR regulations require each inmate to participate in 8 hours per day of programming, including labor, education, counseling, physical fitness, and other programs, 5 days per week. Existing law also authorizes a board of supervisors or city council, through an order, to require all persons confined in a county or city jail, industrial farm, or road camp, as specified, to perform labor on the public works or ways in the county or city, respectively, and to engage in the prevention and suppression of forest, brush, and grass fires upon lands within the county or city, respectively. Notwithstanding any other law, the California Constitution, as amended by Proposition 57 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, grants CDCR the authority to award credits earned for good behavior and approved rehabilitative or educational achievements. This bill would authorize inmates 55 years of age or older, or inmates with mental or physical disabilities, as defined, except those sentenced to death, in state prison or county jail to elect whether to continue to work, reduce the number of hours worked, or retire. The bill would prohibit CDCR from punishing the inmate, in specified ways including a change or reduction in privilege group assignment, based on their election.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/10/25 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1144
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a change in document formatting and presentation only: the bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative print layout (with line numbers, page headers, and column formatting) to a web-based display format (with navigation elements and different typographic structure). The actual statutory language of Sections 2700 and 4017 of the Penal Code is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a traditional legislative print layout to a web-based display format. All substantive bill text, including the digest, statutory amendments to Penal Code Sections 2700 and 4017, definitions, and provisions regarding elderly and disabled inmate work elections, remains unchanged.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tina McKinnor
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1144
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1144. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline