Teacher credentialing: dual credentialing.
What changed between versions
The commission's role changed from convening a workgroup that merely 'recommends measures' to directly 'develop[ing], establish[ing], and promulgat[ing]' efficient routes for dual credentialing. This gives the commission actual rulemaking authority rather than just advisory input.
Routes must now be developed 'through the regulatory process pursuant to Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code,' which is California's Administrative Procedure Act requiring formal notice, public comment, and other procedural safeguards.
A new requirement was added that the commission act 'with input from the education field' when developing routes, ensuring stakeholder participation in the rulemaking process.
A new requirement was added for the commission/workgroup to 'identify any necessary statutory changes to establish routes to dual credentialing,' explicitly directing attention to potential legislative follow-up needed.
A new deadline of March 1, 2027 was added by which the commission must develop, establish, and promulgate the dual credentialing routes through the regulatory process. The workgroup still convenes by July 1, 2026.
The deadline for the commission to provide its report to the Legislature changed from December 31, 2026 to July 1, 2027, giving an additional six months.
A new legislative intent subsection (Section 1(b)) was added stating it is the Legislature's intent to provide efficient and accessible routes for educators to become dually credentialed and to ensure input from relevant stakeholders is sought and considered.
The third workgroup representative category changed from 'a regionally accredited institution of higher education that is a division within a county office of education' to 'a local educational agency that prepares teachers through internship programs,' broadening which organizations can be represented on the workgroup.