Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003: nitrous oxide: licensure.
Summary
Existing law, the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensing Act of 2003, requires the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to issue a license to a retailer to engage in the sale of cigarettes or tobacco products upon receipt of a completed application and payment of certain fees unless any of certain exceptions apply. Existing law subjects licenses issued by the act to suspension or revocation for specified violations. Existing law prohibits a person from dispensing or distributing nitrous oxide to a person if the distributor knows or should know that the person is going to use the nitrous oxide for certain unlawful purposes and that person proximately causes great bodily injury or death to that person or another person. Existing law also requires a person who dispenses or distributes nitrous oxide to record each transaction involving the dispensing or distribution of nitrous oxide in a written or electronic document, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of either of these provisions a misdemeanor. This bill would require a court to order the suspension, for up to one year, of the business license of a person who knowingly violates either of those provisions after having been previously convicted of a violation of the respective provision, except as specified. This bill would specify violations subjecting licenses to suspension or revocation include, among others, the crimes above, as specified. The bill would exempt from the license issuance requirement the issuance of a license to a retailer who has been convicted of specified crimes relating to the distribution of nitrous oxide, including the misdemeanors described above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/20/25 - Introduced
→
AB1107
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same bill text from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web-based bill tracking page format. All statutory content, penalties, requirements, and exemptions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative document with line numbers and page breaks into a web-based presentation format with navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.). No changes to the actual statutory language were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 7, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Heath Flora
RRepublican
Co
Ali Macedo
RRepublican
Co
Heather Hadwick
RRepublican
Co
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
Co
Phillip Chen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1107
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1107. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline