AB 1074 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

CalWORKs.

Summary
(1) Under existing law, if the federal government provides funds for the care of a needy relative with whom a needy child is living, aid to the child for any month includes aid to meet the needs of that relative, except as prescribed. Existing law establishes the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, under which each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families using federal, state, and county funds. Existing law provides that the parent or parents are to be considered living with the needy child for a period of up to 6 months, or for a time period as determined by the State Department of Social Services, of the needy child's absence from the family assistance unit, and that the parents are eligible for CalWORKs aid and childcare services if specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the child has been removed from the parent or parents and that the family was receiving aid under when the child was removed. Existing law requires all applicants for or recipients of CalWORKs to ensure and provide documentation that each child in the assistance unit who is not required to be enrolled in school has received all age-appropriate immunizations, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to the provisions regarding a parent's eligibility to receive aid as if the child or children were living with them. The bill would also specify that those provisions do not require (A) all children to be removed from the parent or parents or (B) that, at the time of removal, the needs of the parent or parents were included in the grant. The bill would make these provisions that authorize the provision of aid and child care services, as specified, operative on July 1, 2026, or when the Statewide Automated Welfare System can perform the necessary automation, whichever is later, and would prohibit the implementation of these provisions from resulting in a retroactive payment or underpayment. The bill would exempt a family participating in a reunification case plan from specified immunization requirements. To the extent that this bill would expand county responsibilities under the CalWORKs program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law generally requires a recipient of CalWORKs to participate in welfare-to-work activities as a condition of eligibility. Existing law requires the recipient and the county welfare department to enter into a written welfare-to-work plan that includes the activities and services that will move the individual into employment. Existing departmental guidance strongly encourages, for individuals receiving benefits as described in paragraph (1) , counties to use a CalWORKs family reunification plan, which is the case plan developed by the county child welfare services agency for the provision of services to those individuals, in lieu of the welfare-to-work plan. This bill would instead authorize, for those individuals, either (A) a case plan, as specified, to serve as a CalWORKs family reunification plan or (B) a jointly developed child welfare services and CalWORKs welfare-to-work plan to serve as the CalWORKs family reunification plan, both of which would satisfy the requirement to have a welfare-to-work plan. To the extent that this bill would expand county responsibilities under the CalWORKs program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to defray a portion of county costs under the CalWORKs program. This bill would provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for the purposes of implementing the bill. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Vetoed
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 20, 2025 Vetoed Oct 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

09/05/25 - Amended Senate 09/12/25 - Enrolled · 2 edits · Sep 12, 2025
MINOR
The enrolled version of AB 1074 makes one minor substantive clarification and the rest are formatting changes. In Section 11203(b), the word 'longer' was removed from the phrase describing the department's authority to set a time period for when parents are considered living with their child, changing it from 'a longer time period as determined by the department' to 'a time period as determined by the department.' The legislative digest was correspondingly updated to characterize the bill as making 'technical changes' rather than specifying new departmental authority. All other differences are formatting: removal of line numbers, addition of passage dates and governor's approval block for the enrolled version.
TECHNICAL

Section 11203(b) removed the word 'longer' from 'a longer time period as determined by the department,' changing it to 'a time period as determined by the department.' This is a minor clarification that does not change the practical effect since the department was already authorized to set a different time period.

The legislative counsel's digest was rewritten to describe the bill as making 'technical changes' to parent eligibility provisions, rather than stating the bill would 'specify that the department may determine' a longer time period. This reflects the same minor wording change in the statutory text.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2025 · Assembly Jun 4, 2025

How they voted

344
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 9, 2025
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
4 Yea 4 Nay 2
40% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Jan 22, 2026
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 6, 2025
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 6, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 13. Page 3230.).
lower
Sep 9, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 4. Page 2675.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 13. Page 2069.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Darsh Patel
Darsh Patel
DDemocratic
CA
76