Law enforcement agencies: military equipment.
Summary
Existing law requires a law enforcement agency, as defined, to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by adoption of a military equipment use policy prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined. Existing law requires the governing body to approve a military equipment use policy only if it determines compliance with certain standards, including that the military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. This bill would add to those standards that the United States Armed Forces has not been prohibited by federal law or regulation from purchasing the military equipment from the manufacturer or seller of the military equipment. By adding to the duties of local governing bodies with respect to the acquisition of military equipment, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 18, 2023
Last action Aug 15, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 22, 2023
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 22, 2023
D
Democratic31
90% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Aug 15, 2024
Lower · Passed
August 15 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 2, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2024
Committee
July 2 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) Reconsideration granted.
lower
Jun 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1211.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 8, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 900.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
Mar 22, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
Mar 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 25, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 18, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Umberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 99
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 99. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline