Check Sellers, Bill Payers and Proraters Law: exemption: nonprofit community service organizations.
Summary
The Check Sellers, Bill Payers and Proraters Law (Proraters Law) prohibits, among other things, a person, without first obtaining a license from the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation, from acting as a person who, for compensation, engages in whole or in part in the business of receiving money or evidences thereof for the purpose of distributing the money or evidences thereof among creditors in payment or partial payment of the obligations of the debtor. The Proraters Law exempts from the requirements of the law imposed on proraters a nonprofit community service organization that meets certain criteria, including that the nonprofit community service organization has as its principal functions consumer credit education, counseling on consumer credit problems and family budgets, arranging or administering debt management plans, and arranging or administering debt settlement plans. The Proraters Law also provides as a criteria for exemption that the nonprofit community service organization receives from a debtor no more than certain amounts to offset the organization's actual and necessary expenses for those services, including a one-time sum not to exceed $50 for education and counseling combined in connection with debt management or debt settlement services and, for debt management plans, a sum not to exceed 8% of the money disbursed monthly or $35 per month, whichever is less. The Proraters Law provides as a criteria for exemption that the nonprofit community service organization maintains at all times a surety bond in the amount of $25,000 issued by an insurer licensed in this state. This bill would instead provide as a criteria for exemption from the Proraters Law that the nonprofit community service organization receives from a debtor no more than a one-time sum not to exceed $100 for education and counseling combined in connection with debt management or debt settlement services and, for debt management plans, a sum not to exceed 15% of the money disbursed monthly or $75 per month, whichever is less. The bill would also revise and recast the requirement for exemption from the Proraters Law that a nonprofit community service organization has as one of its principal functions counseling on consumer credit problems and family budgets to specify that the counseling is via in-person, telephone, and virtual communication. The bill would also increase the surety bond requirement described above from $25,000 to $100,000. By narrowing the scope of nonprofit community service organizations that are exempt from the Proraters Law, a willful violation of which is punishable as a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2024
Committee Review
Jul 2024
Senate Passage
Apr 2024
Assembly Passage
Aug 2024
Signed into Law
Aug 2024
Introduced Jan 29, 2024
Signed Aug 19, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Apr 18, 2024 · Assembly Aug 8, 2024
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Apr 18, 2024
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Aug 19, 2024
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 8, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 6249.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jul 2, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (July 2).
lower
Jun 26, 2024
Lower · Passed
June 26 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 18, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 18, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3672.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 4, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3465.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 14, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Jan 29, 2024
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 985
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 985. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline