Ticket sellers: exclusivity.
Summary
Existing law provides for the comprehensive regulation of ticket sellers, including prohibiting a ticket seller from contracting to sell or accepting payment for tickets unless the ticket seller has lawful possession of the ticket; has a contractual right to obtain the ticket; or informs the purchaser the seller does not have possession of the tickets, has no contract to obtain the offered ticket, and may not be able to supply the ticket at the contracted price, as specified. This bill would prohibit the operator of an entertainment facility and a primary ticket seller from entering into a contract that provides for the primary ticket seller to be the exclusive ticket seller for the operator of the entertainment facility. The bill would prohibit threatening or seeking to enforce such a provision or to otherwise penalize an operator of an entertainment facility for entering into an agreement with another primary ticket seller. Existing law defines a primary contractor as the person or organization who is responsible for the event for which tickets are being sold. Existing law declares that regulation of ticket sellers does not apply to a primary contractor or seller of tickets for the primary contractor operating under a written contract with the primary contractor. This bill would declare that the provisions of this bill apply to a primary contractor and a seller of tickets for the primary contractor operating under a written contract with the primary contractor. Existing law declares that violations of statutory regulations of ticket sellers are punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would make entering into a contract that provides for the primary ticket seller to be the exclusive ticket seller for the operator of the entertainment facility punishable as a misdemeanor. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Apr 4, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2023
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 31, 2023
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Jun 15, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on A., E., S., & T. and P. & C.P.
lower
May 31, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1385.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1185.) (May 18).
upper
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 896.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 17, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 747.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
April 24 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E. D. and JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 829
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 829. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline