Unemployment insurance: trade disputes: eligibility for benefits.
Summary
Existing law provides for the payment of unemployment compensation benefits and extended benefits to eligible individuals who meet specified requirements. Under existing law, unemployment benefits are paid from the Unemployment Fund, which is continuously appropriated for these purposes. Existing law makes an employee ineligible for benefits if the employee left work because of a trade dispute and specifies that the employee remains ineligible for the duration of the trade dispute. Existing case law holds that employees who left work due to a lockout by the employer, even if it was in anticipation of a trade dispute, are eligible for benefits. This bill would restore eligibility after the first 2 weeks for an employee who left work because of a trade dispute. The bill would codify specified case law that holds that employees who left work due to a lockout by the employer, even if it was in anticipation of a trade dispute, are eligible for benefits. The bill would specify that the bill's provisions do not diminish eligibility for benefits of individuals deprived of work due to an employer lockout or similar action, as specified. Because this bill would expand the categories of people eligible to receive benefits from a continuously appropriated fund, it would make an appropriation.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Vetoed
Jan 2024
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Vetoed Jan 25, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2023 · Assembly Sep 11, 2023
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 25, 2023
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Jan 25, 2024
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Sep 30, 2023
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 30, 2023
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 2777.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 2770.)
upper
Sep 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2611.) Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Sep 12, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 59. Noes 18. Page 3180.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 7, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (September 7).
lower
Aug 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (August 31). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 24, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Aug 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jul 6, 2023
Lower · Passed
July 11 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 25, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1305.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1184.) (May 18).
upper
Apr 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 803.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
Feb 17, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 29 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
Co
Alex Lee
DDemocratic
Co
Ash Kalra
DDemocratic
Co
Buffy Wicks
DDemocratic
Co
Caroline Menjivar
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Co
Corey Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Damon Connolly
DDemocratic
Co
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
Co
Dawn Addis
DDemocratic
Co
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 799
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 799. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline