Corporate Transparency Act: foreign corporations: certificate of qualification.
Summary
The General Corporation Law (GCL) prohibits a foreign corporation from transacting intrastate business, as defined, without having first obtained from the Secretary of State a certificate of qualification and stating, as prescribed, certain information, including the state or place of its incorporation or organization and a statement that the foreign corporation is authorized to exercise its powers and privileges in that state or place of its incorporation or organization. The GCL makes a foreign corporation that transacts intrastate business without complying with the GCL guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill, the Corporate Transparency Act, would require a foreign corporation to additionally disclose certain information with respect to any beneficial owner, as defined, of the foreign corporation, including the owner's full legal name. By expanding the scope of the misdemeanor described above, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act authorizes a foreign limited liability company to apply for a certificate of registration to transact business in this state by delivering an application to the Secretary of State for filing on a form prescribed by the Secretary of State that states certain information, including the state or other jurisdiction under whose law the foreign limited liability company is organized and a statement that the foreign limited liability company is authorized to exercise its powers and privileges in that state or other jurisdiction. This bill would require a foreign limited liability company to additionally disclose certain information with respect to any beneficial owner, as defined, of the foreign limited liability company, including the owner's full legal name. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
April 19 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 10, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Mar 29, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F.I.
upper
Mar 21, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 17, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Melissa Hurtado
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 738
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 738. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline