SB 716 California Senate · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Excluded employees: binding arbitration.

Summary
Existing law, the Bill of Rights for State Excluded Employees, permits, among other things, excluded employee organizations to represent their excluded members in their employment relations, including grievances, with the state. That law defines excluded employees as all managerial employees, confidential employees, supervisory employees, and specified employees of the Department of Personnel Administration, the Department of Finance, the Controller's office, the Legislative Counsel Bureau, the Bureau of State Audits, the Public Employment Relations Board, the Department of Industrial Relations, and the State Athletic Commission. This bill would enact the Excluded Employee Arbitration Act to permit an employee organization that represents an excluded employee who has filed certain grievances with the Department of Human Resources to request binding arbitration of the grievance if specified conditions are met. The bill would require the designation of a standing panel of arbitrators and, under specified circumstances, the provision of arbitrators from the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service within the Public Employment Relations Board. The bill would then require the arbitrator to be chosen in a specified manner and would prescribe the duties of that arbitrator. This bill would grant a party to the arbitration the right to have a certified shorthand reporter transcribe the proceeding and would deem the transcription the official record of the proceeding. The bill would require a nonprevailing party, other than an excluded employee, to bear the costs of arbitration and would prohibit passing the costs of arbitration on to the excluded employee. The bill would repeal its provisions on January 1, 2029.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Vetoed
Jan 2024
Introduced Feb 16, 2023 Vetoed Jan 25, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2023 · Assembly Sep 13, 2023

How they voted

40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 25, 2023
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Jan 25, 2024
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 8, 2023
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 8, 2023
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3354.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Jul 6, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E. & R. and JUD.
lower
May 25, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1304.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1181.) (May 18).
upper
Apr 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 800.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 713.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Feb 16, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Marie Alvarado-Gil
Marie Alvarado-Gil
RRepublican
CA
4