California Council on Science and Technology Policy Fellows: status of services.
Summary
Existing law, commonly known as the code of ethics, prohibits a Member of the Legislature or an employee of either house of the Legislature from receiving or agreeing to receive, directly or indirectly, any compensation, reward, or gift from any source except the State of California for any service, advice, assistance, or other matter related to the legislative process, except for specified circumstances. Under existing law, the services of a California Science and Technology Policy Fellow provided by the California Council on Science and Technology and duly authorized by the Senate Committee on Rules, the Assembly Committee on Rules, or the Joint Committee on Rules are not compensation, a reward, or a gift to a Member of the Legislature for purposes of the code of ethics, and the fellow is not an employee of either house of the Legislature for these purposes, provided that certain requirements are met. This bill would similarly clarify that the services of a California Science and Technology Policy Fellow duly authorized by an executed memorandum of understanding between the California Council on Science and Technology and an executive branch agency or department, as specified, are not a gift for purposes of the Political Reform Act of 1974 and not compensation of a state elective or appointive officer. The bill would also similarly clarify that the fellow is not included in "state civil service" for the purposes of the State Civil Service Act. The bill would state that these provisions are declaratory of existing law. Existing law prohibits a Member of the Legislature, state elective or appointive officer, or judge or justice from having any interest, engaging in any business, transaction, or professional activity, or incurring any obligation that is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of their duties in the public interest and of their responsibilities, as specified. Under this bill, the services of a California Science and Technology Policy Fellow, as specified, would not be an interest, business, transaction, professional activity, or obligation of a Member of the Legislature, state elective or appointive officer, judge, or justice that is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of their duties in the public interest or of their responsibilities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Jul 2023
Signed into Law
Jul 2023
Introduced Feb 16, 2023
Signed Jul 21, 2023
Floor votes · Senate May 1, 2023 · Assembly Jul 13, 2023
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 1, 2023
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Jul 21, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2647.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
May 11, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 960.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 24, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 833.) (April 19).
upper
Mar 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 16, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 698
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 698. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline