Visitation rights.
Summary
Existing law governs the determination of child custody and visitation in contested proceedings. Existing law requires the court, for purposes of deciding custody or visitation, to determine the best interests of the child based on certain factors, including the health, safety, and welfare of the child, and the nature and amount of contact with both parents, except as specified. Existing law also requires the court to determine, under designated circumstances, whether to require that visitation to be supervised, suspended, limited, or denied. Under existing law, if the court finds that a party is staying in a domestic violence shelter or other confidential location, the court is required to design a visitation order to prevent disclosure of the location of the shelter or other confidential location. This bill, among other things, would require the court, in determining whether to require the above-described limitations on visitation, to consider virtual visitation, as defined. The bill would require a court, if it finds that a party is staying at one of the above-described locations due to domestic violence or fear of domestic violence from the other parent, to order in-person visitation only if the court finds that in-person visitation is in the best interest of the child and taking into consideration, among other things, the potential for disclosure of the confidential location. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to develop standards for supervised visitation providers in accordance with specified guidelines. When developing standards, existing law requires the Judicial Council to consider, among other things, the provider's qualifications, experience, and education. Under existing law, the term "provider" includes any individual who functions as a visitation monitor, as well as supervised visitation centers. This bill would authorize superior court locations to serve as supervised visitation and exchange locations, and would also authorize the court to designate employees and contractors to provide supervised visitation and exchange services or assistance with those services. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 3011 of the Family Code proposed by AB 957 to be operative only if this bill and AB 957 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Feb 15, 2023
Signed Oct 8, 2023
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2023 · Assembly Sep 1, 2023
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 31, 2023
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
12
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Oct 8, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 7, 2023
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2464.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 60. Noes 3. Page 2885.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 16, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jun 20, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 31, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1406.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1176.) (May 18).
upper
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
May 1 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 799.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 22, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 15, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 599
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 599. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline