SB 303 California Senate · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Solid waste: Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act.

Summary
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, generally regulates the disposal, management, and recycling of, among other solid waste, plastic packaging containers and single-use foodware accessories. Existing law establishes the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, which covers certain single-use packaging and plastic single-use food serviceware, as provided. As part of its comprehensive statutory scheme, existing law requires producers, as defined, of these covered materials to source reduce plastic covered material, to ensure that all covered material offered for sale, distributed, or imported in or into the state on or after January 1, 2032, is recyclable or compostable, and to ensure that plastic covered material offered for sale, distributed, or imported in or into the state achieves specified recycling rates, as provided. The act prohibits a producer from selling, offering for sale, importing, or distributing covered materials in the state unless the producer is approved to participate in the producer responsibility plan of a producer responsibility organization (PRO) , as prescribed, for the source reduction, collection, processing, and recycling of covered material, except as provided. The act requires the department to establish a producer responsibility advisory board for specified purposes. The act authorizes an affected entity that asserts that specific actions taken to meet the requirements of the act are disrupting or otherwise adversely affecting the sustained operation or commercial viability of solid waste collection programs, solid waste recycling facilities, or composting facilities providing services in accordance with local solid waste handling requirements, to bring the concern and evidence supporting that assertion to the advisory board for discussion and to ask the advisory board to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the information. If the evaluation demonstrates that specific actions are disrupting or otherwise adversely affecting existing operations, the act requires the advisory board to submit the concern to the department for further analysis. The act requires the department to analyze the information provided by the advisory board and authorizes the department to offer a recommendation for resolution. This bill would instead authorize an affected entity that asserts that specific actions taken by the PRO, a producer, or an entity under contract with the PRO are not consistent with specified prohibitions and requirements of the act and are disrupting or otherwise adversely affecting the sustained operation or commercial viability of solid waste collection programs, solid waste recycling facilities, or composting facilities providing services in accordance with local solid waste handling requirements to bring that concern and supporting evidence to the advisory board. The bill would delete the requirement that the board submit the concern to the department for further analysis and would instead require that the advisory board, rather than the department, offer a recommendation for resolution within 90 days of submission of the request for a preliminary evaluation. The bill would thereafter authorize either party to initiate nonbinding arbitration, as specified. The bill would specify the duties and the authority of the arbitrator, as described, including requiring the arbitrator to transmit the proposed decision to the department and the advisory board. The bill would require the department to review the arbitrator's proposed decision within 60 days of receipt and to make a specified determination. If the arbitrator proposes a revision to an approved producer responsibility plan, the bill would require the department to publicly notice the proposed plan revision on its internet website, as provided. The bill would authorize the department, if the department makes a specified determination, to approve or reject the proposed plan revision. The bill would authorize any party to request that the department conduct a de novo adjudicative proceeding within 60 days after the arbitrator delivers the proposed decision to the department and the advisory board. The bill would deem the arbitrator's proposed decision to be final if no action is taken by the department or other party within 60 days of the arbitrator's proposed decision being submitted to the department and the advisory committee. The bill would require the department to include any actions taken under these provisions in a specified report submitted to the Legislature. The bill would also require an approved producer responsibility plan to remain in effect and be implemented during any action taken pursuant to these new and revised procedures in response to an assertion described above. The bill would also prohibit initiation of that action from delaying the approval of a proposed plan or plan amendment. The act authorizes the department to adopt regulations to identify responsible end markets and to establish criteria regarding benefits to the environment and minimizes risks to public health and worker health and safety. The act sets forth definitions for purposes of the act. This bill would instead authorize the department to adopt regulations to establish standards for the PRO regarding responsible end markets for covered material and to establish criteria that prioritizes benefits to the environment and minimizes risks to public health and worker health and safety. The bill would also revise and clarify certain definitions in the act. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 42041 of the Public Resources Code proposed by AB 1526 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1526 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Vetoed
Jan 2024
Introduced Feb 2, 2023 Vetoed Jan 25, 2024
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2023 · Assembly Sep 11, 2023

How they voted

40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 25, 2023
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
37
Key actions
14
Committee
6
Amendments
10
Jan 25, 2024
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 8, 2023
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 8, 2023
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2672.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3154.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 7, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Jul 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 11).
lower
Jun 29, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 26).
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
lower
May 25, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1297.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1164.) (May 18).
upper
Apr 27, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 892.) (April 25).
upper
Apr 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 793.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 29, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
Mar 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 15, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 2, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ben Allen
Ben Allen
DDemocratic
CA
24