Electricity: energization transparency and efficiency: wholesale distribution service.
Summary
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) with regulatory jurisdiction over public utilities, including electrical corporations. This bill would require each electrical corporation to provide distribution planning data, as defined, to development project applicants, energizing entities, as defined, and public entities in a timely and efficient manner. The bill would require the PUC to require each electrical corporation to develop and make publicly available uniform technical standards and requirements for the energization of electrical load on the distribution system and information about its distribution system interconnection queue necessary for the energization of electrical load. The bill would require each electrical corporation that has filed a wholesale distribution tariff with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to offer service under that tariff to the state, an agency, authority, or instrumentality of the state, or a political subdivision to transmit electricity that those public entities consume or sell directly to an ultimate consumer, as provided. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the PUC is a crime. Because a violation of a PUC action implementing the bill would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2024
Senate Passage
Apr 2023
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 1, 2023
Last action Jul 1, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Apr 10, 2023
How they voted
25–1
Passed · 14 other
Total votes 40
Apr 10, 2023
D
Democratic31
80% Yea
R
Republican9
11% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Jun 20, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Jun 13, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jun 20, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jun 12, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L. & E. and U. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and L. & E.
lower
Apr 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 1. Page 632.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Mar 27, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 535.) (March 27).
upper
Feb 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E. D.
upper
Feb 1, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 284
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 284. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline