Administrative regulations: public participation: comment process.
Summary
Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, sets forth the requirements for the adoption, publication, review, and implementation of regulations by state agencies. The act prohibits a state agency from issuing, utilizing, enforcing, or attempting to enforce any guideline, standard of general application, or other rule that is a regulation, as defined, unless it has been adopted as a regulation and filed with the Secretary of State. The act further requires every agency subject to the act to submit to the Office of Administrative Law a notice of proposed action and to make available to the public a copy of an initial statement of reasons for the regulation. Existing law additionally requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, as specified. Each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, is also required to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis addressing various additional factors. Existing law generally defines a "major regulation" for these purposes to mean the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as estimated by the agency. This bill would require a state agency to provide a minimum 21-day public comment period for purposes of determining whether the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation would be a "major regulation" that requires a standardized regulatory impact analysis. Existing law also requires each state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation on or after November 1, 2013, and that has prepared a standardized regulatory impact analysis, as described, to submit that analysis to the Department of Finance upon completion. Existing law requires the department to then comment, within 30 days of receiving that analysis, on the extent to which the analysis adheres to specified regulations adopted by the department. Upon receiving any comments from the department, the agency may update its analysis to reflect any comments received and summarize those comments and the agency's response, along with a statement of the results of the updated analysis. This bill would require the department, upon receipt of the analysis, as descried above, to provide a 30-day public comment period on the analysis. The bill would then require the department to comment, within 30 days of receiving public input on that analysis, on the extent to which the analysis adheres to the regulations adopted by the department.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 1, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
May 18 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 25, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 873.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 29, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Mar 21, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 1, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Niello
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 279
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 279. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline