SB 235 California Senate · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Civil discovery.

Summary
The Civil Discovery Act authorizes the court, with the stipulation of the parties to a civil action other than an unlawful detainer or small claims action, to order the parties to provide initial disclosures to the other parties to the action within 45 days of the court's order. Existing law requires a party providing initial disclosures to provide information regarding persons who have information, or records containing information, supporting the party's claims and defenses, and information regarding agreements which would make a person or an insurance company liable to satisfy a judgment in the action through reimbursement or indemnification. Existing law requires a party to supplement or correct such a disclosure or response, as specified. Existing law requires initial disclosures to be verified by the party under penalty of perjury. Under existing law, these provisions do not apply to unlawful detainer actions or actions brought in the small claims division of a court, as specified. This bill would instead require each party that has appeared in a civil action to provide initial disclosures, as specified, to the other parties to the action within 60 days of a demand by any party to the action unless modified by the stipulation of the parties. The bill would require a party making initial disclosures of persons or records to additionally disclose persons or records that are relevant to the subject matter of the action, except as specified, and to disclose information and records regarding insurance policies or contracts that would make a person or insurance company liable to satisfy a judgment. The bill would allow a party who has made, or responded to, a demand for initial disclosures to propound supplemental demands, as specified. The bill would instead require initial disclosures to be verified via the written declaration of the party or the party's authorized representative, or signed by the party's counsel. The bill would exempt any party not represented by counsel from these requirements. In addition to the exemptions described above, the bill would specify that its provisions do not apply to actions or proceedings commenced in whole or in part under the Family Code or Probate Code, or to an action in which a party has been granted preference, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2027. Existing law requires a court to impose a $250 sanction against a party, person, or attorney upon findings that the party, person, or attorney (1) failed to respond in good faith to a document request, (2) produced the requested documents within 7 days of a motion to compel that is filed by the requesting party as a result of the other party, person, or attorney's failure to respond in good faith, or (3) failed to meet and confer in person, by telephone, by letter, or other means of communication in writing, to resolve any dispute regarding the request. This bill would increase the amount of the sanction to $1,000.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Sep 2023
Introduced Jan 24, 2023 Signed Sep 30, 2023
Floor votes · Senate May 15, 2023 · Assembly Sep 7, 2023

How they voted

38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 15, 2023
D Democratic31
29 Yea 2
93% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
13
Committee
5
Amendments
8
Sep 30, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2598.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 7, 2023
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 7, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3007.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 16, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jul 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 5).
lower
Jun 27, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 19, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 26, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 15, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1074.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 798.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 1, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 24, 2023
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Tom Umberg
Tom Umberg
DDemocratic
CA
34