Law enforcement: social media.
Summary
Existing law requires law enforcement agencies, departments, or entities to consider specified best practices regarding the downloading and storage of body-worn camera data, including prohibiting agency personnel from uploading recorded data onto public and social media internet websites, when establishing policies and procedures for the implementation and operation of a body-worn camera system. Existing law prohibits a police department or sheriff's office from sharing, on social media, booking photos of an individual arrested on suspicion of committing a nonviolent crime, as defined, unless specified circumstances exist. Existing law requires a police department or sheriff's office that shares, on social media, a booking photo of an individual arrested for the suspected commission of a nonviolent crime to remove the information from its social media page, upon request, unless the same specified circumstances exist. Existing law also requires a police department or sheriff's office to remove the booking photo of a person who has committed any other crime from social media if the individual's record has been sealed, the individual's conviction has been dismissed, expunged, pardoned, or eradicated, the individual has been issued a certificate of rehabilitation, the individual is found not guilty of committing the crime for which they were arrested, or the individual was ultimately not charged with the crime or the charges were dismissed. With respect to an individual who has been arrested for any crime, this bill would require a police department or sheriff's office, upon posting a booking photo on social media, to use the name and pronouns given by the individual arrested. The bill would authorize a police department or sheriff's office to use other legal names or known aliases of an individual in limited specified circumstances. This bill would also require that a police department or sheriff's office remove any booking photo shared on social media after 14 days unless specified circumstances exist. Because the bill would impose higher duties on local law enforcement, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Sep 2023
Introduced Feb 15, 2023
Signed Sep 23, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2023 · Assembly May 25, 2023
How they voted
26–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Sep 5, 2023
D
Democratic31
83% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
6
Sep 23, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 7, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 20. Page 3027.).
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 2374.).
upper
Aug 16, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 6, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB S. and JUD.
upper
May 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 17. Page 1739.)
lower
May 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 10).
lower
May 3, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 1, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 25).
lower
Mar 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 23, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 16, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Corey Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Ward
DDemocratic
Co
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 994
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 994. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline