AB 965 California Assembly · 2023-2024 Regular Session

Local government: broadband permit applications.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Permit Streamlining Act, governs the approval process that a city or county is required to follow when approving, among other things, a permit for construction or reconstruction for a development project for a wireless telecommunications facility and a collocation or siting application for a wireless telecommunications facility. This bill, except as specified, would require a local agency to undertake batch broadband permit processing, as defined, upon receiving 2 or more broadband permit applications for substantially similar broadband project sites submitted at the same time by the same applicant, within a presumptively reasonable time, as defined. The bill would define "local agency" for these purposes to mean a city, county, city and county, charter city, special district, or publicly owned utility, other than certain publicly owned electric utilities. If a local agency does not approve those broadband permit applications for substantially similar broadband project sites and issue permits, or reject the applications and notify the applicants, within the presumptively reasonable time or longer period permitted under applicable law, the bill would require that all of those permits be deemed approved. The bill would authorize a local agency to place reasonable limits on the number of broadband project sites that are grouped into a single permit while undertaking batch broadband permit processing, as specified. The bill would provide that a local agency may only remove a broadband project site from grouping under a single permit under mutual agreement with the applicant or to expedite the approval of other substantially similar broadband project sites. The bill, if a local agency denies a broadband permit application, would require the local agency to notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the denial. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to eligible facility requests, as defined. (2) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (3) By imposing new duties on local agencies with regard to the processing of broadband permit applications, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Feb 14, 2023 Signed Oct 8, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2023 · Assembly May 22, 2023

How they voted

40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 6, 2023
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
9
Oct 8, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3178.).
lower
Sep 6, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2400.).
upper
Aug 30, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
May 31, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U. & C. and GOV. & F.
upper
May 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1699.)
lower
May 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 17).
lower
May 2, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 24, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 19).
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on C. & C. and L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and C. & C.
lower
Feb 15, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Juan Carrillo
Juan Carrillo
DDemocratic
CA
39