Courts.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Judicial Council to dispose of surplus court facilities pursuant to a specified process that requires, among other things, the Judicial Council to consult with the county where the court facility is located, offer the facility to the county at a fair market value before offering it to another state or local government agency, and deposit the funds received from a sale into the State Court Facilities Construction Fund. The California Constitution requires the proceeds from the sale of surplus state property to be deposited into the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties, a continuously appropriated fund. This bill would, notwithstanding any other law, specifically authorize the Judicial Council to sell various properties, including, among others, the Gordon D. Schaber Sacramento County Courthouse, if the sale complies with certain requirements. The bill would require the net proceeds from the sale of the courthouse to be deposited into the State Court Facilities Construction Fund. The bill would state that the disposition of this property is not a sale or other disposition of surplus state property within the meaning of the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2023
Last action Sep 1, 2023
Floor votes · Assembly May 30, 2023
How they voted
80–0
Passed
Total votes 80
May 30, 2023
D
Democratic62
100% Yea
R
Republican18
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 21, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 30, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 1885.).
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 23, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 959
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 959. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline