Alternative dispute resolution: complaints.
Summary
The California Constitution provides that on stipulation of the parties litigant the court may order a cause to be tried by a temporary judge who is a member of the State Bar, sworn and empowered to act until final determination of the cause. Existing law expresses the findings and declarations of the Legislature that the peaceful resolution of disputes in a fair, timely, appropriate, and cost-effective manner is an essential function of the judicial branch of state government under Article VI of the California Constitution, and that many disputes can be resolved in a fair and equitable manner through processes that are less formal than litigation culminating in a trial. Existing law requires specified parties to engage in mediation or arbitration prior to filing an action in specified civil proceedings. Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation governed by a board of trustees. The act provides for the investigation and discipline of members of the State Bar. The California Rules of Professional Conduct govern attorney conflicts of interest. This bill would require a dispute resolution neutral, as defined, or an alternative dispute resolution, as defined, provider who receives a complaint against the dispute resolution neutral alleging that they violated a provision of any applicable rule of conduct, as specified, in the course of presiding over an alternative dispute resolution proceeding to submit a report to the State Bar of California, as specified, and provide the complainant with written information regarding available procedures for notifying the State Bar of California, as specified. If the complaint arises from a mediation or arbitration, the bill would require that written information to include a notice with specified language.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2023
Last action Jun 29, 2023
Floor votes · Assembly May 18, 2023
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 80
May 18, 2023
D
Democratic62
93% Yea
R
Republican18
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jun 29, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 31, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1596.)
lower
May 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
Apr 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 18, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Apr 6, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 27, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jesse Gabriel
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 924
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 924. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline