Open meetings: teleconferencing: subsidiary body.
Summary
Existing law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, requires, with specified exceptions, each legislative body of a local agency to provide notice of the time and place for its regular meetings and an agenda containing a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted. The act also requires that all meetings of a legislative body be open and public, and that all persons be permitted to attend unless a closed session is authorized. The act generally requires for teleconferencing that the legislative body of a local agency that elects to use teleconferencing post agendas at all teleconference locations, identify each teleconference location in the notice and agenda of the meeting or proceeding, and have each teleconference location be accessible to the public. Existing law also requires that, during the teleconference, at least a quorum of the members of the legislative body participate from locations within the boundaries of the territory over which the local agency exercises jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to use alternate teleconferencing provisions during a proclaimed state of emergency (emergency provisions) and, until January 1, 2026, in certain circumstances related to the particular member if at least a quorum of its members participate from a singular physical location that is open to the public and situated within the agency's jurisdiction and other requirements are met (nonemergency provisions) . Existing law imposes different requirements for notice, agenda, and public participation, as prescribed, when a legislative body is using alternate teleconferencing provisions. The nonemergency provisions impose restrictions on remote participation by a member of the legislative body and require the legislative body to provide specific means by which the public may remotely hear and visually observe the meeting. This bill, until January 1, 2026, would authorize a subsidiary body, as defined, to use similar alternative teleconferencing provisions and would impose requirements for notice, agenda, and public participation, as prescribed. The bill would require at least one staff member of the local agency to be present at a designated primary physical meeting location during the meeting. The bill would require the local agency to post the agenda at the primary physical meeting location. The bill would require the members of the subsidiary body to visibly appear on camera during the open portion of a meeting that is publicly accessible via the internet or other online platform, as specified. The bill would also require the subsidiary body to list a member of the subsidiary body who participates in a teleconference meeting from a remote location in the minutes of the meeting. In order to use teleconferencing pursuant to this act, the bill would require the legislative body that established the subsidiary body by charter, ordinance, resolution, or other formal action to make specified findings by majority vote, before the subsidiary body uses teleconferencing for the first time and every 12 months thereafter. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
May 2024
Assembly Passage
Jan 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2023
Last action Jun 5, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 25, 2024
How they voted
54–8
Passed · 18 other
Total votes 80
Jan 25, 2024
D
Democratic62
80% Yea
R
Republican18
44% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
4
May 29, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 21, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 1, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
upper
Jan 25, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 8. Page 3930.)
lower
Jan 17, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jan 16, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 10).
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 817
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 817. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline