Vehicles: required stops: bicycles.
Summary
Existing law requires the driver of any vehicle, including a person riding a bicycle, when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection, to stop before entering the intersection. A violation of this requirement is an infraction. This bill would require a person who is 18 years of age or older riding a bicycle upon a two-lane highway when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection with another roadway with two or fewer lanes, where stop signs are erected upon all approaches, to yield the right-of-way to any vehicles that have either stopped at or entered the intersection, or that are approaching on the intersecting highway close enough to constitute an immediate hazard, and to pedestrians, as specified, and continue to yield the right-of-way to those vehicles and pedestrians until reasonably safe to proceed. The bill would require other vehicles to yield the right-of-way to a bicycle that, having yielded as prescribed, has entered the intersection. The bill would state that these provisions do not affect the liability of a driver of a motor vehicle as a result of the driver's negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of a motor vehicle. The bill would impose a warning citation for a first violation by a person who is under 18 years of age and fails to stop when approaching a stop sign at the entrance of an intersection. The bill would also require the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to submit a report to the Legislature, as specified, regarding the effects of this bill. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2031. By changing the elements of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2022
Committee Review
Jul 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 13, 2022
Last action Jul 11, 2023
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2023
How they voted
56–17
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 80
May 31, 2023
D
Democratic62
87% Yea
R
Republican18
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jul 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 17. Page 1958.)
lower
May 17, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 17).
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 20, 2023
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on March 9 corrected.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 13, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 9, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Dec 14, 2022
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 13.
lower
Dec 13, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 73
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 73. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline