Juvenile Detention Facilities Improvement Grant Program.
Summary
Existing law requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to adopt minimum standards for the operation and maintenance of juvenile halls for the confinement of minors. Existing law requires the judge of the juvenile court of the county to annually inspect any jail or juvenile hall that was used for the confinement of any minor and to notify the operator of the jail or juvenile hall of any observed noncompliance with the minimum standards of the juvenile facility adopted by the board. Existing law defines a county of the first class as a county containing a population of 4,000,000 and over. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, this bill would create the Juvenile Detention Facilities Improvement Grant Program, to be administered by the board, to provide grants to a county of the first class to address the critical infrastructure needs of the state's detained and supervised youth in the county. The bill would require, as a condition for receiving a grant, a county of the first class to prepare a juvenile detention facilities improvement plan for the expenditure of funds for capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the county's juvenile detention facilities to enhance each facility's rehabilitation function. The bill would require the plan to be approved by both the board and the governing body of the county. The bill would require the board, by January 1, 2025, to submit a report to the budget and public safety committees of the Legislature detailing the grants awarded and the projects funded through the program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Vetoed
Jan 2024
Introduced Feb 13, 2023
Vetoed Jan 3, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2023 · Assembly May 30, 2023
How they voted
30–6
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Sep 13, 2023
D
Democratic31
77% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Jan 25, 2024
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Jan 3, 2024
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 8, 2023
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3539.).
lower
Sep 13, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 2728.).
upper
Sep 8, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (September 1).
upper
Jul 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
May 30, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 1. Page 1910.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (May 18).
lower
May 10, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 27, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 25).
lower
Mar 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 23, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 695
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 695. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline