Public employment: retirement: benefits.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) , which is administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, authorizes the board to contract for health benefit plans for employees and annuitants, as defined, which may include employees and annuitants of contracting agencies. Under existing law, the employee's or annuitant's contribution is the total cost per month of coverage less the portion contributed by the employer. Existing law prescribes a minimum level for the employer's contribution toward the employee's or annuitant's health benefits coverage. This bill would authorize the City of San Gabriel to enter into an agreement applicable to specified employees hired, and elected officials who first served, on or after January 1, 2023, to provide employer contributions for postretirement health care coverage to employees with at least 5 years of credited service with the City of San Gabriel. The bill would provide that its provisions for postretirement health benefits apply to employees who retire on or after the date that a memorandum of understanding that authorizes this benefit becomes effective. The bill would require the City of San Gabriel to provide notice, as prescribed, of the agreement and any additional information necessary to implement these benefits. (2) Existing law establishes the Judges' Retirement System II, which provides retirement and other benefits to its members and is administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System. Under the Judges' Retirement System II, a judge is eligible to retire upon attaining both 65 years of age and 20 or more years of service, or upon attaining 70 years of age with a minimum of 5 years of service. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2024, and applicable only to judges who retire before January 1, 2029, additionally authorizes a judge who is 60 years of age and has 15 years or more of service or 65 years of age and has 10 years or more of service who is not eligible to retire pursuant to those provisions in lieu of receiving monetary credits, as specified, to elect to retire and defer receipt of a monthly allowance, subject to specified formulations. Existing law requires the retirement allowance to be increased for the cost of living in January of each year after a judge has been retired under those provisions for more than 6 months, as specified. This bill would instead require the retirement allowance to be increased for the cost of living in January of each year after the judge receives a retirement allowance under those provisions for more than 6 months, as specified. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of San Gabriel.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jun 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Feb 9, 2023
Signed Oct 8, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2023 · Assembly May 4, 2023
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 11, 2023
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
7
Oct 8, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3283.).
lower
Sep 11, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 11, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2851.).
upper
Sep 5, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 17, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 4, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1462.)
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 17, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 12, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Mar 27, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E. & R. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
Feb 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Fong
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 658
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 658. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline