California State University: Cybersecurity Regional Alliances and Multistakeholder Partnerships Pilot Program.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Cybersecurity Regional Alliances and Multistakeholder Partnerships Pilot Program to address the cybersecurity workforce gap. Existing law requires the office of the Chancellor of the California State University to select any number of California State University campuses, with preference given to campuses that have or are developing regional pipeline programs in cybersecurity with the California Community Colleges, to participate in the pilot program through an application and selection process. Existing law requires each selected campus to create a pilot program with goals and metrics, measure the impact and results of its pilot program, and annually share the impact and results with the chancellor's office. Existing law requires the chancellor's office to annually report the impact and results from each selected campus's pilot program to the Legislature. This bill would require the chancellor's office, on or before July 1, 2028, to submit a report to the Legislature on the pilot program, as provided.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jul 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Jul 2023
Signed into Law
Jul 2023
Introduced Feb 8, 2023
Signed Jul 27, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Jul 13, 2023 · Assembly Jun 1, 2023
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jul 13, 2023
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Jul 27, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2039.).
upper
Jul 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2023
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (80-0)
assembly
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2058.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 10, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 29, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on M. & V.A.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on M. & V.A. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on M. & V.A. and HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 9, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eduardo Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 569
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 569. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline