Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: groundwater adjudication.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a court from approving entry of judgment in certain adjudication actions for a basin required to have a groundwater sustainability plan under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, unless the court finds that the judgment would not substantially impair the ability of a groundwater sustainability agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the Department of Water Resources to comply with the act and to achieve sustainable groundwater management. This bill would require the parties to an adjudication action to submit a proposed settlement agreement determining rights to water to the board for a nonbinding advisory determination as to whether the proposed settlement agreement will substantially impair the ability of a groundwater sustainability agency, the board, or the department to achieve sustainable groundwater management before filing the proposed settlement agreement with the court. The bill would require the board to provide its nonbinding advisory determination to the parties no later than 120 days after the proposed settlement agreement was submitted, and would require the parties to include the board's nonbinding advisory determination in the court filing, as provided. The bill would require the board to consult with the department before making its nonbinding advisory determination, and would require the nonbinding advisory determination to include findings on the consistency of the proposed settlement agreement with the groundwater sustainability plan and on how the proposed settlement agreement would affect small and disadvantaged groundwater users, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 8, 2023
Last action Aug 15, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2023
How they voted
48–19
Passed · 13 other
Total votes 80
May 31, 2023
D
Democratic62
77% Yea
R
Republican18
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
6
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 26, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and JUD.
upper
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 19. Page 1988.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 18).
lower
May 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 17, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 11).
lower
Mar 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on W., P., & W. and JUD.
lower
Feb 9, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bennett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 560
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 560. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline