State departments: investigations and hearings: administrative subpoenas.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the head of a department in state government to make investigations and prosecute actions concerning all matters relating to the business activities and subjects under the jurisdiction of the department, violations of any law or rule or order of the department, and other matters as may be provided by law. Existing law requires the head of a department, in any hearing in any part of the state or in any investigation conducted pursuant to the law described above, to issue process and subpoenas in a manner consistent with the California Constitution and the United States Constitution. Existing law requires the process and subpoenas to be served in the same manner as provided for the service of a summons, as prescribed. Existing law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of, or access to, electronic communication information from a service provider, subject to certain exceptions, including by authorizing a government entity to compel the production of, or access to, electronic communication information from a service provider pursuant to a subpoena if the information is not sought for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting a criminal offense and compelling the production of, or access to, the information via the subpoena is not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law. This bill would authorize a department to use an administrative subpoena to obtain electronic communication information from a service provider only if certain conditions are met, including that the department has served notice of the administrative subpoena on the customer, as prescribed, and a copy of the administrative subpoena is attached to the notice. This bill would require a service provider to make a copy of any electronic communication information within the scope of the subpoena and to retain it only until the information is disclosed pursuant to the subpoena, or the subpoena is quashed or modified. The bill would require a service provider to maintain, for a period of 5 years, a record of any disclosure pursuant to the bill. The bill would require a service provider to provide to a customer, upon request and the payment of the reasonable cost of reproduction and delivery, any part of the record maintained pursuant to the bill that relates to the customer.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Sep 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2023
Last action Sep 1, 2023
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2023
How they voted
80–0
Passed
Total votes 80
Jun 1, 2023
D
Democratic62
100% Yea
R
Republican18
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Sep 1, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 12, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 28, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB S. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB S.
upper
Jun 1, 2023
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (80-0)
assembly
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2052.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 17, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 8, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ash Kalra
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 522
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 522. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline