Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training: assessment of training requirements.
Summary
Under existing law, the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training is responsible for developing and implementing programs to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement. The commission is required to adopt rules establishing minimum standards relating to physical, mental, and moral fitness governing the recruitment of specified peace officers. This bill would require the commission to perform specified duties, including, among other things, partnering with academic researchers to conduct an assessment of existing officer training requirements and determining how well the existing officer training requirements are working for officers in the field. The bill would require the commission to report its findings to the Legislature by January 1, 2026. This bill would require the commission to establish a permanent academic review board to, among other things, regularly review and update the commission's training standards and curriculum to ensure alignment with the latest scientific research. The existing California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, unless an exemption from disclosure applies. This bill would require information that is collected in order to improve training and to encourage more rigorous analysis of officer training programs to be kept confidential but would allow the information to be made available to the commission or research institutions for analysis. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 1, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Mar 29, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 7, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 3, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Matt Haney
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 390
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 390. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline