Land conservation: California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act: County of San Bernardino.
Summary
(1) The California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act, an initiative measure approved by the voters in the June 7, 1988, statewide primary election, provided bond funds for wildlife, coastal, and parkland conservation. The initiative measure authorizes the act to be amended by a 23 vote of the Legislature if the amendment is consistent with the purposes of the act. Existing law requires an applicant receiving state funds under the act to maintain any property acquired in perpetuity, as specified, and use the property only for the purposes stated in the act and to make no other use, sale, or other disposition of the property except as authorized by a specific act of the Legislature. Existing law authorizes the County of San Bernardino to sell or exchange property it owns within the Chino Agricultural Preserve that was purchased with grant funds if it meets certain conditions. Among those conditions, existing law requires the county to preserve all lands and conservation easements acquired or dedicated as authorized by the act in perpetuity for open-space conservation purposes or agricultural preservation, and specifies that open-space conservation includes community gardens, agricultural heritage projects, agricultural and wildlife education or wildlife habitat. This bill would additionally authorize preservation of those lands or easements for park and recreational purposes, and would explicitly include, to the extent they are consistent with the purposes of the act, playgrounds, recreational venues, sporting venues, amphitheaters, and preservation of historical resources as appropriate purposes. (2) Existing law prohibits the county from selling, exchanging, or otherwise acquiring replacement land or conservation easements unless and until the board of supervisors for the county adopts a detailed land plan. Existing law requires the land plan to, among other things, identify each parcel of property acquired with grant funds and show which specific parcels the county will sell, exchange, purchase, or retain. Existing law required the land plan to be approved by the Department of Parks and Recreation, as specified. Existing law authorizes the county to propose a plan to the department for the expenditure of any unexpended proceeds from the sale or exchange of land under the land plan for the acquisition of land or easements, or capital improvements to land or easements purchased with grant funds. This bill would eliminate the explicit authorization and procedures specifically applicable to the expenditure of these unexpended proceeds. Existing law authorizes the county to use all income generated from the properties it owns within the preserve that were purchased with grant funds, or that were acquired by exchange or purchase as authorized, except revenues from the sale or exchange of land, for the acquisition of additional replacement land within the preserve pursuant to the land plan or for the improvement, operation, and maintenance of existing or replacement land within the preserve. This bill would authorize the county to use the revenues from the sale or exchange of land for these purposes, and would specify new purposes for which that revenue, and all income generated from the properties the county owns within the preserve that were purchased with grant funds or that were acquired by exchange or purchase, may be used. The bill would declare that these requirements are an amendment of the act within the meaning of Section 6 of the act and is consistent with the act.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2024
Last action Aug 15, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2024
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 12 other
Total votes 80
May 23, 2024
D
Democratic62
88% Yea
R
Republican18
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 1, 2024
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 18, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 5, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 23, 2024
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-12)
assembly
May 22, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 5531.)
lower
May 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 8, 2024
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 11, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 9, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 8, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and HUM. S.
lower
Feb 17, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3182
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3182. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline