False advertising: abortion.
Summary
Existing law makes it unlawful for a person doing business in California and advertising to consumers in California to make any false or misleading advertising claim. Existing law, the Unfair Competition Law, makes various practices unlawful and provides that a person who engages, has engaged, or proposes to engage in unfair competition is liable for a civil penalty, as specified. Existing law prohibits the state from denying or interfering with an individual's fundamental right to choose or obtain an abortion. Existing law, which was previously held unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court, requires a covered facility to disseminate to its clients a specified notice regarding abortion. Existing law authorizes the Attorney General, city attorney, or county counsel to bring an action to impose a specified civil penalty against covered facilities that fail to comply with these requirements. This bill would prohibit a person doing business in California who is performing, has performed, or intends to perform a pregnancy-related service from advertising using a false or misleading statement related to the person's provision, or lack of provision, of abortion. The bill would make a violation of that prohibition an unfair business practice, and would authorize an entity authorized to enforce unfair competition laws, a district attorney, a county counsel, or a city attorney to file for injunctive relief or seek a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would also authorize a person harmed to bring a private right of action seeking injunctive relief, a monetary penalty of at least $1,000, actual damages, and reasonable attorney's fees.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 26, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Feb 1, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 3, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 21, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 14, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 27, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 315
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 315. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline