Telephone corporations: carriers of last resort: tariffs.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Public Utilities Commission to supervise and regulate every public utility in the state, including telephone corporations, and to fix just and reasonable rates and charges for public utilities. Existing law requires the commission, on or before February 1, 1995, to issue an order initiating an investigation and open a proceeding to examine the current and future definitions of universal service in telecommunications. Pursuant to that provision, the commission issued a decision involving carriers of last resort, including the withdrawal process for carriers of last resort, defined as a carrier who provides local exchange service and stands ready to provide basic service to any customer requesting such service within a specified area. This bill would no longer require a telephone corporation seeking relief from carrier of last resort obligations to be a carrier of last resort or to have any carrier of last resort obligations if the telephone corporation submits a notice containing certain information to the commission and modifies and removes its commission tariffs. The bill requires telephone corporations to identify, as part of the notice, (1) a census block of the telephone corporation's service territory where there is no population or where the company has no basic exchange telephone service customers, or (2) a census block designated as urban where 2 or more different service providers offer alternative voice services, as defined, to customers, or both. The bill would also require the telephone corporation to acknowledge in the notice that it will not discontinue basic exchange telephone service until certain federal requirements are satisfied. The bill would require these telephone corporations to provide certain public benefits commitments, including, among things, by providing education to affected customers to explain the benefits and advantages of transitioning to modern networks and services. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill are within the act, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Jul 2024
Assembly Passage
Apr 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2024
Last action Jul 1, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 25, 2024
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 80
Apr 25, 2024
D
Democratic62
96% Yea
R
Republican18
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Jul 1, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 12, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Jun 11, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 10, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 6, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 8, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Apr 25, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 4999.)
lower
Apr 17, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 17).
lower
Apr 4, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 4, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tina McKinnor
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2797
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2797. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline