Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person subject to a protective order, as defined, from owning, possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm or ammunition while that protective order is in effect and makes a willful and knowing violation of a protective order a crime. Existing law requires the court, when issuing the order with both parties present, to inform the parties of this information and to order the restrained person to relinquish any firearm or ammunition in the person's immediate possession or control or subject to their immediate possession or control. Existing law specifies the means of relinquishment if the law enforcement officer serving the protective order does not request the immediate surrender of the firearm or ammunition, including, surrender to law enforcement, or by selling the firearm or ammunition to a licensed gun dealer. Existing law requires a court to order the restrained person to relinquish firearms or ammunition and to notify the parties of how any firearms or ammunition still in the restrained party's possession are to be relinquished and how to submit a receipt to the court. Existing law authorizes the court to grant an exemption from the relinquishment order for a particular firearm or ammunition if the respondent can show that the firearm or ammunition is a necessary condition of continued employment and the person cannot be reassigned, as specified, and only authorizes possession on the job or traveling to and from employment. If the person is a peace officer who carries a firearm or ammunition as a condition of employment and the peace officer's personal safety depends on the ability to carry a firearm or ammunition, the court may exempt them from the relinquishment order, on duty or off, if the court finds that the peace officer does not pose a threat of harm. Existing law requires, prior to making this finding, that the court require a mandatory psychological evaluation of the peace officer and authorizes the court to require the peace officer to enter into counseling or other remedial treatment program to deal with any propensity for domestic violence. This bill would revise the peace officer exemption to authorize a court to allow a peace officer to carry a specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition if the peace officer is required, as a condition of continued employment, to carry that firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition, as specified, if they cannot be reassigned, and if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence, in writing or on the record, that the peace officer's personal safety depends on the ability to carry that specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition outside of scheduled work hours and they do not pose an additional threat of harm to a protected party or the public, as specified. The bill would require the mandatory psychological evaluation of the peace officer to be conducted by a mental health professional with domestic violence expertise and would require the court to consider the results of that evaluation. This bill would authorize an exemption from the relinquishment requirement, only during scheduled working hours, for a nonpeace officer who is required to carry a specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition as a condition of continued employment, as specified, if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence, in writing or on the record, that the respondent does not pose an additional threat of harm to a protected party or the public by having access to the specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition. The bill would authorize the court to order a psychological evaluation by a licensed mental health professional with domestic violence expertise to make this finding. The bill would require the court, if an exemption is granted during the pendency of a temporary restraining order and the court subsequently issues a restraining order on the same application, to review and make a finding regarding the appropriateness of the granted exemption, as provided. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6389 of the Family Code proposed by SB 899 to be operative only if this bill and SB 899 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Jun 2024
Assembly Passage
Apr 2024
Senate Passage
Aug 2024
Signed into Law
Sep 2024
Introduced Feb 15, 2024
Signed Sep 24, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Jun 27, 2024 · Assembly Apr 18, 2024
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Jun 27, 2024
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
12
Committee
5
Amendments
8
Sep 24, 2024
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2024
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 28, 2024
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 28, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 23, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 23, 2024
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
upper
Jun 27, 2024
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 27, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 20, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 19, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
Jun 4, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 4). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 1, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB S. and JUD.
upper
Apr 18, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 9, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 3, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 4, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cottie Petrie-Norris
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2759
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2759. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline