Prison visitation.
Summary
Under existing law, a person sentenced to imprisonment in a state prison or in a county jail for a felony offense, as specified, may, during that period of confinement, be deprived of only those rights as is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. This bill would prohibit a person sentenced to imprisonment in a state prison from being prevented from receiving personal visits, including, but not limited to, noncontact and family visits, unless necessary and narrowly tailored to further legitimate security and safety interests. The bill would specify conduct that could be deemed necessary and for legitimate security and safety interests if the conduct occurs within visiting areas during visiting hours or the conduct poses a clear and imminent risk of physical violence within visiting areas and during visiting hours. Existing law authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to prescribe and amend rules and regulations for the administration of prisons. Existing law requires these regulations to recognize and consider the value of inmate visitation as a means of increasing safety in prisons, maintaining family and community connections, and preparing inmates for successful release and rehabilitation. Existing regulations create the framework for establishing a visitation process in prisons that is conducted in as accommodating a manner as possible, subject to the need to maintain order, the safety of persons, the security of institutions and facilities, and required prison activities and operations. This bill would prohibit the department from denying or restricting in-person contact and noncontact visits, except as specified. The bill would require the department to inform both the visitor and the incarcerated person of the specific reason for any denial of a visit, as specified. The bill would require the department to provide at least 3 days of in-person visiting per week. The bill would require all infrastructure and areas initially erected for the purposes of providing family visits for incarcerated persons to be used only for the purpose of family visits, except as provided. Existing law requires the department to develop policies related to its contraband interdiction efforts for individuals entering department detention facilities, including, but not limited to, the establishment of unpredictable, random search efforts and methods, as specified. This bill would prohibit the department from using strip searches, visual body cavity searches, and physical body searches of visitors under 18 years of age. The bill would require the department to maintain multiple methods by which to search visitors, including, but not limited to, metal detectors, body scanners, and other contactless screening methods. The bill would authorize the department to conduct a strip search of minors if the department has probable cause and obtains a warrant to search. The bill would require the department, when there is probable cause that a minor visitor is attempting to introduce contraband, unauthorized substances, or other unauthorized items into the institution, to notify the individual and their parent or guardian in writing, and would require the department to obtain consent from the minor and their guardian before conducting a search. The bill would permit the department to offer a noncontact visit, if feasible, or deny the visit if the minor and their parent or guardian do not consent to the minor being searched. The bill would require the department to issue a written notice detailing the reason for denial or restriction, as specified, if a visitor is denied visitation or has visitation restricted.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2024
Last action Aug 15, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 23, 2024
How they voted
47–8
Passed · 25 other
Total votes 80
May 23, 2024
D
Democratic62
74% Yea
R
Republican18
44% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 5, 2024
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 2, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 19, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
Jun 5, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB S.
upper
May 23, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 8. Page 5614.)
lower
May 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 16, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 24, 2024
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 3, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 4, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 15, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mia Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2709
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2709. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline