Charter schools: renewal criteria.
Summary
The Charter Schools Act of 1992 authorizes the establishment and operation of charter schools. Existing law sets out performance standards and procedures for the renewal of the charter of an existing charter school based on the charter school's performance level as determined by data reported on the California School Dashboard, with specific requirements for renewal applicable to 3 specified tiers of performance for those charter schools. Existing law, operative on January 1, 2020, requires a chartering authority to, until January 1, 2026, consider verified data, as defined, in order to determine whether a charter school in the 2 lower tiers demonstrates measurable increases in academic achievement or strong postsecondary outcomes, and to include that consideration, in addition to the charter school's performance level, in its decisions as to whether to renew the charter for the 2 renewal terms immediately following the enactment of that measure. Existing law requires a chartering authority to consider verifiable data provided by the charter school for the purposes of charter renewal if the dashboard for the previous year is not yet available at the time of renewal. Existing law will require a chartering authority, after January 1, 2026, to consider the data reported on the dashboard for of all subgroups of pupils served by the charter school in its decision as to whether to renew the charter. This bill would extend the requirement of a chartering authority to consider verified data for the purposes described above until the State Board of Education adopts the performance standards for growth for the state board adopted pupil-level academic growth measure for English language arts and mathematics, instead of until January 1, 2026. The bill would also require a chartering authority to consider the data the State Department of Education uses to produce the dashboard, instead of verifiable data, for the purposes of charter renewal if the dashboard for the previous year is not yet available at the time of renewal. This bill would require a chartering authority, after the adoption of the performance standards for growth for the state board adopted pupil-level academic growth measure for English language arts and mathematics, to consider performance on those standards, in addition to the data reported on the dashboard, in its decision as to whether to renew the charter. By imposing new duties on local educational agencies acting as chartering authorities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the department to publish on its internet website resources for chartering authorities to use during charter renewal related to data analysis. The bill would require the department to, on or before the 60th day following the release of the California School Dashboard, publish on its internet website a list of the names and performance levels of each charter school in the state. The bill would require a charter school to authorize its chartering authority to receive verified data from each assessment publisher. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2024
Committee Review
Jul 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 8, 2024
Last action Jul 3, 2024
Floor votes · Assembly May 22, 2024
How they voted
58–1
Passed · 21 other
Total votes 80
May 22, 2024
D
Democratic62
67% Yea
R
Republican18
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jul 3, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 29, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 22, 2024
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-1-21)
assembly
May 21, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 1. Page 5436.)
lower
May 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 15, 2024
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 30, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Feb 26, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 9, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blanca Rubio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2254
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2254. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline