Task force: former Chavez Ravine property: eminent domain: compensation.
Summary
The California Constitution authorizes private property to be taken or damaged for public use only if just compensation is paid. Existing law, the Eminent Domain Law, prescribes how that constitutionally authorized power may be exercised for an eminent domain proceeding commenced on or after January 1, 1976, as specified. Under the Eminent Domain Law, an owner of property acquired by eminent domain is entitled to compensation, as provided. Existing law provides that, whenever a program or project to be undertaken by a public entity will result in the displacement of a person, the displaced person, as defined, is entitled to payment for actual moving and related expenses as the public entity determines to be reasonable and necessary. This bill would create in state government a task force known as the Chavez Ravine Displaced Residents Task Force, subject to appropriation by the Legislature, to evaluate the history of the residents, business owners, and landowners displaced from the Chavez Ravine area for the purpose of providing compensation to the persons displaced from the Chavez Ravine area between 1950 to 1961, inclusive, or their descendants in order to develop recommendations for the City and County of Los Angeles and the Legislature regarding how to provide just compensation to the persons wrongfully displaced from Chavez Ravine from 1950 to 1961, inclusive, or their descendants. The bill would set forth the composition of the task force, consisting of 9 members, as specified. This bill would require the task force to make recommendations regarding compensation for individuals displaced from Chavez Ravine and strategies for educating the public about the history and impact of the Chavez Ravine displacement. The bill would additionally require the City of Los Angeles to construct a permanent memorial in recognition of the displaced residents and landowners of the Chavez Ravine community. The bill would also require the task force to provide recommendations regarding consideration of development of a searchable database to access information related to Chavez Ravine, as specified. By imposing new duties on the City of Los Angeles and city officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Los Angeles. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2024
Committee Review
Aug 2024
Assembly Passage
May 2024
Senate Passage
Aug 2024
Vetoed
Sep 2024
Introduced Jan 29, 2024
Vetoed Sep 20, 2024
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2024 · Assembly May 21, 2024
How they voted
33–6
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 29, 2024
D
Democratic31
100% Yea
R
Republican9
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
12
Amendments
9
Sep 20, 2024
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2024
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 30, 2024
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 6.).
upper
Aug 15, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 15).
upper
Aug 12, 2024
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2024
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 9, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 26, 2024
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 6, 2024
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 29, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
upper
May 21, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 6. Page 5406.)
lower
May 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (May 16).
lower
May 8, 2024
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 29, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 25, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 11, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2024
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 1, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 21, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 21, 2024
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
lower
Jan 30, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Wendy Carrillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1950
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1950. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline