Secure youth treatment facilities.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a court to order a ward who is 14 years of age or older to be committed to a secure youth treatment facility, operated by the county of commitment, for a period of confinement if the ward is adjudicated and found to be a ward based on the commitment of a specified serious offense committed when the juvenile was 14 years or older, that adjudication is the most recent offense for which the ward has been adjudicated, and the court has made a finding on the record that a less restrictive, alternative disposition for the ward is unsuitable. Existing law requires the baseline term of confinement to be determined according to offense-based classifications, as specified. This bill would prohibit a youth, following a youth's commitment to a secure youth facility, from being found ineligible for continued commitment to a secure youth treatment facility as a result of subsequent adjudicated petitions. The bill would prohibit a court from increasing a youth's current baseline term of confinement based on subsequent adjudications. Prior to filing a criminal charge based on in-custody conduct, the bill would authorize the prosecution to consider the interests of the rehabilitation of the ward, including, among other things, the extent to which the conduct is a manifestation of the needs for which the ward is receiving programming, treatment, and education pursuant to an individual rehabilitation plan and the impact on a potential baseline term reduction at a 6-month review hearing, as specified. (2) Existing law requires a court to schedule and hold a progress review hearing for a ward not less frequently than once every 6 months to evaluate the ward's progress in relation to the rehabilitation plan, as specified. Upon a motion from the probation department or the ward, existing law authorizes a court to order that the ward be transferred from a secure youth treatment facility to a less restrictive program, as specified. This bill would, upon request of the minor, require a hearing under these provisions to be conducted as expeditiously as possible once commenced.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2024
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2024
Last action Apr 30, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Apr 30, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
lower
Apr 2, 2024
Lower · Passed
In committee: Reconsideration refused.
lower
Mar 13, 2024
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2024
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 7, 2024
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 6, 2024
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 5, 2024
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 24, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1896
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1896. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline