Health professionals and facilities: adverse actions based on another state's law.
Summary
Existing law establishes various boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs to license and regulate various health professionals. Existing law prohibits the Medical Board of California, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, the Board of Registered Nursing, and the Physician Assistant Board from denying an application for licensure or suspending, revoking, or otherwise imposing discipline upon a licensee because the person was disciplined in another state in which they are licensed solely for performing an abortion in that state or because the person was convicted in another state for an offense related solely to performing an abortion in that state. Existing law provides for the licensure of clinics and health facilities by the Licensing and Certification Division of the State Department of Public Health. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor, except as specified. This bill would prohibit a healing arts board under the Department of Consumer Affairs from denying an application for a license or imposing discipline upon a licensee or health care practitioner on the basis of a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action in another state that is based on the application of another state's law that interferes with a person's right to receive sensitive services, as defined, that would be lawful in this state, regardless of the patient's location. The bill would similarly prohibit a health facility from denying staff privileges to, removing from medical staff, or restricting the staff privileges of a licensed health professional on the basis of such a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action imposed by another state. The bill also would also prohibit the denial, suspension, revocation, or limitation of a clinic or health facility license on the basis of those types of civil judgments, criminal convictions, or disciplinary actions imposed by another state. The bill would exempt from the above-specified provisions a civil judgment, criminal conviction, or disciplinary action imposed by another state based upon conduct in another state that would subject an applicant, licensee, or health care practitioner to a similar claim, charge, or action under the laws of this state. By imposing new prohibitions under the provisions related to clinics and health facilities, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Sep 2023
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Signed Sep 27, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2023 · Assembly May 22, 2023
How they voted
31–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 5, 2023
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
13
Committee
10
Amendments
8
Sep 27, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 13. Page 3169.).
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2371.).
upper
Aug 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 10, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 6, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 19, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E. D. and JUD.
upper
May 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 12. Page 1697.)
lower
May 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (May 10).
lower
May 3, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 14. Noes 2.) (April 11).
lower
Mar 20, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Co
Sharon Quirk-Silva
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1707
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1707. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline