Family law proceedings: custody, parentage, and adoption.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, a superior court has jurisdiction under California law to make judicial determinations regarding the custody and care of children within the meaning of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. Existing law requires the court to make specified findings when making an order regarding special immigrant juvenile status pursuant to the act. Existing law authorizes those findings to be made at any point in a proceeding, as specified. This bill, as of January 1, 2025, would, among other things, revise those provisions to allow the superior court jurisdiction regarding dependency and allow judicial determinations to be made for a child up to 21 years of age. (2) Existing law, the Uniform Parentage Act, defines the parent and child relationship as the legal relationship existing between a child and the child's parents, and provides rebuttable presumptions as to the parentage of a child born under the circumstances of conception through assisted reproduction using donated ova, sperm, or both. The act defines "assisted reproduction" for these purposes to mean conception by any means other than sexual intercourse. This bill would authorize persons who are not married to one another and who share legal control over the disposition of embryos created through assisted reproduction to enter into a written agreement whereby one person renounces all legal interest in the embryos, with the specific intent to not be a legal parent of any child conceived with use of the embryos, as specified. The bill would provide that upon execution of the agreement, the person who retains legal interest in and control over disposition of the embryos would have the sole right to determine the use and disposition of the embryos, and the renouncing person would be treated in law as a donor, and not a legal parent. The bill would authorize either party to file the agreement with the court, and would require the court to issue an order establishing the nonparentage of the donor. (3) Existing law allows, in an adoption proceeding, for continuing contact between the birth relatives and a child if a postadoption contact agreement is entered into voluntarily and is in the best interests of the child at the time the adoption petition is granted. Existing law requires a petitioner who has entered into a postadoption contact agreement with the birth parent to attach the signed agreement to the adoption petition. This bill would require petitioners for adoption to inform the court in writing, on a specified form, whether a postadoption contact agreement has been, or will be, entered into and if a postadoption contact agreement has been entered into, to provide a file-marked copy, as specified. This bill would additionally require the petitioner to file the agreement with the court before the adoption is finalized. The bill also would apply those provisions with respect to independent adoptions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 8616.5 of the Family Code proposed by AB 20 to be operative only if this bill and AB 20 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
May 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Signed Oct 13, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Sep 13, 2023 · Assembly May 11, 2023
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 13, 2023
D
Democratic31
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
3
Amendments
8
Oct 13, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3561.).
lower
Sep 13, 2023
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2758.).
upper
Sep 8, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 29, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 28, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 19, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 24, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 0. Page 1522.)
lower
May 3, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 2, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Mar 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Patterson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1650
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1650. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline