Planning and zoning: zoning regulations: nonconventional single-family residential dwellings.
Summary
Existing law requires a city or county, as specified, to allow the installation of manufactured homes certified under federal law on a foundation system, as specified, on lots zoned for residential dwellings. Except with respect to architectural elements, existing law requires a city or county to subject the manufactured home and the lot on which it is placed to the same development standards as to which a conventional single-family residential dwelling on the same lot would be subject, as specified. Existing law prohibits a city or county from imposing requirements for a roof overhang of a manufactured home unless the same size requirements also would be imposed on a conventional single-family residential dwelling constructed on the same lot. Existing law authorizes a city or county to impose a roof overhang requirement on manufactured homes not to exceed 16 inches whenever there are no size requirements for roof overhangs for manufactured homes and conventional single-family dwellings. This bill would additionally prohibit a city or county from imposing requirements for a roof overhang on a nonconventional single-family residential dwelling unless the same size requirements also would be imposed on a conventional single-family residential dwelling constructed on the same lot. The bill would authorize a city or county to impose a roof overhang requirement on manufactured homes not to exceed 16 inches whenever there are no size requirements for roof overhangs for manufactured homes, conventional single-family dwellings, and nonconventional single-family dwellings. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
0
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Feb 1, 2024
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 31, 2024
Assembly · Failed
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
Mar 27, 2023
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
Mar 23, 2023
Assembly · Amendment offered
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
Mar 23, 2023
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
Feb 18, 2023
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sharon Quirk-Silva
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1632
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1632. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline