Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.
Summary
Under existing law, a person who drives a motor vehicle when the person has 0.08% or more, by weight, of alcohol in their blood, is guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol. Existing law defines vehicular manslaughter as the unlawful killing of a human being without malice aforethought, in the driving of a vehicle, where the killing was either the proximate result of the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony or a lawful act that might produce death, in an unlawful manner, either with or without gross negligence. Under existing law, vehicular manslaughter that is committed while the person was driving under the influence of alcohol is punishable as vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated or gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. Existing law requires the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to a person, other than that driver, or in the death of a person to immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident and provide specified personal information to the injured person or the occupants of the other vehicle and to any traffic or police officer at the scene of the accident. Under existing law, if a vehicle accident results in permanent, serious injury or death, a person who violates the requirement to stop is subject to punishment by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 3, or 4 years, or in a county jail for not less than 90 days nor more than one year, or by a specified fine, or both the imprisonment and fine. Existing law provides for the compensation of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes by the California Victim Compensation Board from the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for specified losses suffered as a result of those crimes. This bill would authorize the child of a victim of those crimes to collect compensation from the Restitution Fund for loss of support until the child reaches 18 years of age, in an amount not to exceed $100,000. By expanding the authorizations for use of moneys in the continuously appropriated Restitution Fund, this bill would make an appropriation.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Feb 1, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 10, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 3, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 19, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 13, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 11, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1551
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1551. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline