Electrical corporations: financing orders: wildfire mitigation expenses.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Public Utilities Commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes an electrical corporation to file an application requesting the commission to issue a financing order to authorize the recovery of costs and expenses related to a catastrophic wildfire, including fire risk mitigation capital expenditures, through the issuance of bonds by the electrical corporation that are secured by a rate component, as provided. This bill would, in addition to capital expenditures related to wildfires, authorize the use of bonds secured by a rate component for recovery of wildfire mitigation efforts, operational and maintenance expenses related to an electrical corporation's wildfire mitigation plan, wildfire risk mitigation costs, and vegetation management costs and expenses. Existing law requires the commission, upon application, to issue the financing order if: (1) the recovery costs to be reimbursed have been found to be just and reasonable, or are allocated to ratepayers as specified; (2) the issuance of the recovery bonds, including all material terms and conditions, is just and reasonable; (3) the issuance of the recovery bonds is consistent with the public interest; and (4) the recovery of the recovery costs through a fixed recovery charge that is assessed as a rate component, to the maximum extent possible, reduces the rate on a present value basis that consumers within the electrical corporation's service territory would pay as compared to the use of traditional utility financing mechanisms, as specified. This bill would, in regards to the determination that the issuance of the recovery bonds is consistent with the public interest in (3) above, require the commission, when considering whether a proposed financing order provides both short-term and long-term economic benefits in the public interest, to presume that the financing order provides short-term economic benefits if the commission has authorized an amortization period in excess of 12 months, as specified.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Feb 1, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Feb 1, 2024
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 17, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 10, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 2, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Mar 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Feb 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lisa Calderon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1513
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1513. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline