Employment protections: call centers.
Summary
Existing law generally regulates the wages, hours, and working conditions of people employed in any occupation. Existing law creates the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the head of which is the Labor Commissioner. Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to enforce certain notice requirements concerning a mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees, including call center employees. Existing law prohibits a call center employer from ordering a relocation of its call center, or one or more of its facilities or operating units within a call center, unless notice of the relocation is provided to the affected employees and the Employment Development Department, local workforce investment board, and the chief elected official of each city and county government within which the termination, relocation, or mass layoff occurs, as specified. Existing law requires a state agency authorized to enter into contracts relating to public benefit programs, as defined, to only contract for services provided by a call center that directly serves applicants for, recipients of, or enrollees in, those public benefit programs with a contractor that certifies in its bid for the contract that the services provided under the contract and any subcontract performed under that contract, to applicants for, recipients of, or enrollees in, those public benefit programs, will be performed solely with workers employed in California, subject to certain exceptions. Existing law imposes a civil penalty, as provided, for knowingly providing false information in that certification. This bill would require each state agency, on and after January 1, 2025, that enters a contract with a private entity specifically for call center work to provide public or customer service for that agency or another state agency to ensure that no later than January 1, 2026, at least 90% of the call center work is conducted in California, except in specified circumstances. This bill would also require each state agency that enters into a contract with a private entity for programs or other services, including no-fee contracts, in which call center work is included but the contract is not specifically for call center work, to prioritize the work being conducted in California. The bill would further require the Department of General Services to establish scoring incentives for those contracts, subject to certain conditions. The bill would create exceptions from these requirements for disasters and overflow work needs, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2023
Committee Review
Jul 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2023
Last action Jul 5, 2023
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2023
How they voted
61–15
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 80
May 31, 2023
D
Democratic62
98% Yea
R
Republican18
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jul 5, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 27, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 31, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 61. Noes 15. Page 2012.)
lower
May 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 18, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (May 18).
lower
Apr 19, 2023
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 22, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
Co
Eloise Reyes
DDemocratic
Co
James Ramos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1381
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1381. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline